Re: [Mimedefang] Auto Responders and SPAM

2006-09-08 Thread John Rudd
Hm. 1) Less than 1% of the mail that slips through my defenses is spam. None of it it viruses. If 80% of what hits someone's autoresponder is spam, then they're idiots. 2) autoresponders are just tools. They're neither good nor evil. They were useful before spam, which means they are u

Re: [Mimedefang] Auto Responders and SPAM

2006-09-08 Thread Adnet Ghislain
80% of emails are spam and viruses with forged from adress. Having an autoresponder is therefor asking for trouble. Auto responder were nice in the 90's but in this world this is a real pain. Like the bounce those are just making the problem worse. Emails cannot be used anymore like in the old

Re: [Mimedefang] Auto Responders and SPAM

2006-09-08 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, David F. Skoll wrote: David Benigni wrote: I have been bitten twice by SPAM email forging addresses, someone vacation rule send a message to a rbl trap account and my servers get black listed. Other than disabling rules like