Re: [Mimedefang] info cuestions

2006-11-02 Thread Jan-Pieter Cornet
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:18:18PM +0100, Jonas Eckerman wrote: Also i need know the size of a message (i use sendmail/milter) Sendmail have this data but i do not know how i can get this data. Of course you can't do this in filter_sender, as filter_sender is called before your system even

Re: [Mimedefang] use Net::LDAP and file descriptor error.

2006-11-02 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Matthew Schumacher wrote: This code: sub filter_initialize { use Net::LDAP; } Just a sidenote: use is a compile-time keyword, hence, it does not matter if you place it in or outern a function. See:

Re: [Mimedefang] LZW, Gifs, and fingerprinting stock spams

2006-11-02 Thread leloup
Am Mittwoch November 1 2006 15:48 schrieb Dave Helton: I have had very good success with this plugin for SA. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin config file allows you to add/remove keywords, and the program keeps a hash of known images so that they are not ocr'ed again. I am

[Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread David F. Skoll
Hi, After much consideration, I have removed the SPF record for roaringpenguin.com. SPF was supposed to help prevent blow-back from joe-jobs. (It was never designed to stop spam, of course, but I *was* hopeful that it would reduce annoying bounces caused by spam faked to come from our domain.)

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread Joseph Brennan
--On Thursday, November 2, 2006 12:34 -0500 David F. Skoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Alas, SPF has not lived up to its promise, and it has caused some problems for us (we have salespeople working on the road who send mail through their ISP's servers.) That sounds familiar. We have a

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread Ernst du Plooy
Alas, SPF has not lived up to its promise, and it has caused some problems for us (we have salespeople working on the road who send mail through their ISP's servers.) So, so long, SPF. Too bad you weren't useful. Interesting. After RBL, Graylist and Forward lookup tests I do SPF tests.

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread Steve Campbell
- Original Message - From: David F. Skoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 12:34 PM Subject: [Mimedefang] SPF Hi, After much consideration, I have removed the SPF record for roaringpenguin.com. SPF was supposed to help

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread David F. Skoll
Steve Campbell wrote: If you have the time, could you explain where the problems you mentioned occurred - were these incoming messages that failed at your server, mail sent to other than your domains that failed due to the ISP being sent from,? I use the word 'failed' as a general term

Re: [Mimedefang] SPF

2006-11-02 Thread Vladimír Solnický
2. 11. 2006 napsal(a) David F. Skoll na téma ,Re: [Mimedefang] SPF`: Apparently, an e-mail someone sent from within our network (ie, it had an SPF pass) was bounced by a broken server because of SPF. That was the final straw. Was it possible to distinguish if it was SPF or Sender-ID (which