David F. Skoll wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Any recommendations?
Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
Regards,
David.
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
-Philip
___
NOTE: If there is a
On 11/5/06, Philip Prindeville [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it...
Personally, I hate XML config files, I'd much rather human readable
ones and *I* can understand and hand edit. I don't want to be reliant
upon some GUI or
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 02:15:12PM -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote:
David F. Skoll wrote:
Philip Prindeville wrote:
Any recommendations?
Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
I have used XML::Simple from perl and
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 15:15, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Why do you want to use XML? IMO, it's a solution looking for a problem.
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
There are 2 advantages of xml. One is that you can use a
generic parser even in languages that are strongly typed -
Rich West wrote:
I know this is now off-topic from the list, and I don't mean to rock the
boat any, but that is a pretty weak excuse. There has to be more to it
than some idiot's broken email server that drove you that decision.
Yes. So it turns out the salesperson in question deleted the
--On Sunday, November 05, 2006 7:09 PM -0500 David F. Skoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the
envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF,
they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all
On 11/5/2006 16:15, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Anyone else have anything to add to this?
Hmm, there's the mother, XML::LibXML, but it might be a more robust
solution than you're looking for.
~Jason
--
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal
I have a question I think I know the answer too, I just thought I would throw it
out to the list for ideas.
I am looking to allow users to maintain their own Bayesian scores through either
SpamAssassin or DSPAM.
I currently have the following configuration:
Sendmail 8.13.7
SpamAssassin 3.1.7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, David F. Skoll wrote:
Actually, it occurs to me that MUAs should allow you to specify the
envelope and header From addresses separately. For the sake of SPF,
they could use [EMAIL PROTECTED], but the From: address (which is all
9 matches
Mail list logo