Re: [Mimedefang] x64 compatible?

2006-11-19 Thread mimedefang
Here is what I have done to help diagnose. Completely reloaded the server just as before, tried to run mimedefang, and still getting seg fault. I don't know how to compile with debugging symbols. Here's the backtrace. Doesn't make any sense to me, I'm hoping it does to you. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Mimedefang] (no subject)

2006-11-19 Thread mimedefang
-- on Tue 11/14/2006 7:00 PM Kenneth Porter wrote: At this prompt, type bt to get a stack backtrace which should show the routine where the crash happened. Make sure you built MD with debugging information so that actual routine names will be displayed. This backtrace actually has an error in

Re: [Mimedefang] x64 compatible?

2006-11-19 Thread mimedefang
-- on Tue 11/14/2006 7:00 PM Kenneth Porter wrote: At this prompt, type bt to get a stack backtrace which should show the routine where the crash happened. Make sure you built MD with debugging information so that actual routine names will be displayed. This backtrace actually has an error in

[Mimedefang] rDNS weirdness in MdF

2006-11-19 Thread Philip Prindeville
I'm seeing the following in my logs: Nov 19 11:49:39 mail mimedefang.pl[11501]: no rDNS: reject [207.220.83.13] Nov 19 11:49:39 mail mimedefang.pl[11501]: filter_relay tempfailed host 207.220.83.13 ([207.220.83.13]) Nov 19 11:49:39 mail sendmail[15385]: kAJInd3l015385: Milter: connect:

Re: [Mimedefang] (no subject)

2006-11-19 Thread Philip Prindeville
Two things: first, you might need to tell gdb where to look for the symbol file, with the file command or with an extra argument from the shell when you start it up. second: your stack is corrupt. From #1 onwards, all of these are dumps are pointing into text... Not stack. If you decode the

Re: [Mimedefang] x64 compatible?

2006-11-19 Thread Jason Gurtz
On 11/19/2006 08:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Still don't know how to compile with debugging. Usually there's an option in the ./Configure script that turns it on. If there's no ./Configure, then look at the Makefile and check for the CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS vars which contain flags that get passed

[Mimedefang] More on mimedefang and x86_64

2006-11-19 Thread Philip Prindeville
Hmmm... I run sendmail/cyrus-imapd/spamassassin/mimedefang on an x86_64 machine (FC5 on an Athalon64 2800+) and it works fine. To keep the mail server simple, however, I wanted to build mimedefang-2.58 on a different machine, so I went ahead and grabbed all of the dependencies. I have to say, I

Re: [Mimedefang] More on mimedefang and x86_64

2006-11-19 Thread Philip Prindeville
Philip Prindeville wrote: I have to say, I was a bit configured. It seems that the build-time dependencies have been muddled with the run-time dependencies. Grrr... dropping big chunks of text. a bit confused on how it's configured. ___ NOTE: