afo cliff wrote:
Yes thanks, I tried that, the down side for me is that it sends a
User Unknown reject notification, which I'm trying to avoid. I
don't want my server to waste time sending 10,000 rejects to a zombie
somewhere.
???
It doesn't send a notification. All it does is reply with a
Matt Garretson wrote:
afo cliff wrote:
@mydomain.com bitbucket
You can also do something like this in your virtusertable:
@mydomain.com error:5.1.1:550 User unknown
Then, you won't need the bitbucket alias.
See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html
Yes thanks, I tried that, the
On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 00:35 -0500, Kenneth Porter wrote:
Has anyone come up with a good scheme/policy for labeling files in the MD
directory so that both MD and ClamAV (and perhaps spamd and other AVs) have
access to them?
If I understand you question, you can run the clamd process as the
afo cliff wrote:
Matt Garretson wrote:
afo cliff wrote:
@mydomain.com bitbucket
You can also do something like this in your virtusertable:
@mydomain.com error:5.1.1:550 User unknown
Then, you won't need the bitbucket alias.
See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html
Yes thanks, I tried
Renaud,
FILTERING BY RECIPIENT
You can define a function called filter_recipient in your filter. This
lets you reject messages to certain recipients, rather than waiting
until the whole message has been sent. Note that for this check to
take place, you must use
Ok, I'm convinced. I'll send the failure responses.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
afo cliff wrote:
Thanks for the info. It mentions using the -t flag ... however, I
start mimedefang with service mimedefang start so I don't have any
control over the flags that are being used.
It sounds like you have Fedora or a Redhat variant? There should
be /etc/sysconfig/mimedefang
Matt Garretson wrote:
afo cliff wrote:
Thanks for the info. It mentions using the -t flag ... however, I
start mimedefang with service mimedefang start so I don't have any
control over the flags that are being used.
It sounds like you have Fedora or a Redhat variant? There should
be
Ok, then it looks like it's better to stick with access/virtusertable rejection.
But, if you have defined everyone in virtusertable with default rejects,
sendmail will process invalid recipients faster than mimedefang can. You
might still get a few instances where where a message comes in with
afo cliff afocl...@gmail.com 09/06/2009 17:18
Ok, then it looks like it's better to stick with access/virtusertable
rejection.
No, it is infinitely better to do it in filter_recipient, and terminate
the connection after a number of invalid recipients.
Consider the case where a spammer
Paul Murphy wrote:
afo cliff afocl...@gmail.com 09/06/2009 17:18
Ok, then it looks like it's better to stick with access/virtusertable
rejection.
No, it is infinitely better to do it in filter_recipient, and terminate
the connection after a number of invalid recipients.
Consider the case
Les Mikesell wrote:
Spammers are a lot smarter than that these days. If you watch your logs
during a dictionary attack you are likely to see the messages come in
from dozens of different IP addresses that are obviously coordinating
the address space and timing so you don't see a big number
That reminds me,
I lost my sendmail blackhole script when my server crashed last year...
I think some people asked me for it -- if you still have a copy you could email
me,
I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks,
-Ben
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer
Les Mikesell l...@futuresource.com 09/06/2009 18:59
Spammers are a lot smarter than that these days. If you watch your logs
during a dictionary attack you are likely to see the messages come in
from dozens of different IP addresses that are obviously coordinating
the address space and
Les Mikesell wrote:
a large number of invalid recipients that makes it obvious spam but it
will still be accepted for a small number of valid addresses. You might
be able to figure that out with some work in filter_recipient - or just
BTW, this reminds me, is MIMEdefang yet able to
Howdie all,
Attached there is a patch against mimedefang.c to enable multiline
responses. This was mentioned in the mailing list some time back and
was a todo on my private mimedefang list.
Can someone take a look at it, and implement it within mimedefang if you
like it. Now my c is kinda
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Matt Garretson ma...@assembly.state.ny.us wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
a large number of invalid recipients that makes it obvious spam but it
will still be accepted for a small number of valid addresses. You might
be able to figure that out with some work in
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, MIMEDefang Mail Daemon mimedef...@roaringpenguin.com
wrote:
The message you sent about 'Re: [Mimedefang] Blocking Dictionary Attacks' was
not delivered to the MIMEDefang mailing list, because it appeared to contain
too much quoted material. Messages are rejected if they
Matt Garretson wrote:
BTW, this reminds me, is MIMEdefang yet able to access sendmail
macros defined after the MAIL FROM stage?
No, this was never implemented.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the
- wrote:
--- On Tue, 6/9/09, Matt Garretson wrote:
$SendmailMacros{'nbadrcpts'} in every filter function, but it
never has a value.
Did you tell Sendmail to provide the value? The default setting is:
Yup, in sendmail.mc :
define(`confMILTER_MACROS_ENVRCPT', confMILTER_MACROS_ENVRCPT``,
20 matches
Mail list logo
