Do you know the sendmail badrcpt_shutdown patch?
http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/
After an defined number of bad recipients the SMTP session terminates:
"Possible SMTP RCPT flood, shutting down connection."
Regards.
Petra Humann
---
Mail:hum...@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
WWW: http://wwwtcs.in
--On Tuesday, June 09, 2009 10:15 AM -0500 Stephen L Johnson
wrote:
If I understand you question, you can run the clamd process as the
'defang' user. It's easy enough for me because I maintain my own
customized (for my site) ClamAV rpm package. Another option is to add
the users the processes
Stefan Schoeman wrote:
> I've been using MIMEDefang for some years now and it is just the most
> fabulous tool.
> It's really the tool that allows me to take control of mail, and not
> just anti-virus and anti-spam.
> Thanks again David for writing this - this is really cool.
>
> I was wondering i
Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Have you considered "pushing" "socket map over UDP (over unix socket)"
into sendmail sources?
No, because rewriting the DB files worked fine for us.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerp
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Austin wrote:
>
>> An idea (no testing, or real assurance that it would work) would be to
>> use MD to write a Socketmap (look in the manpage for mimedefang-filter
>> in the section SOCKET MAPS), then write some m4 for sendmail.cf that
>> will do the appropriate lookups
Les wrote on 06/09/2009 01:59:38 PM:
> And unless you expect messages with a large number of recipients you can
> refuse to accept them without running any perl code:
> define(`confMAX_RCPTS_PER_MESSAGE',`5')dnl
> 'Real' senders are supposed to figure this out and resend but I don't
> know how it
Austin wrote:
An idea (no testing, or real assurance that it would work) would be to
use MD to write a Socketmap (look in the manpage for mimedefang-filter
in the section SOCKET MAPS), then write some m4 for sendmail.cf that
will do the appropriate lookups and piriority/delivery queue/mailer
ass
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Stefan Schoeman wrote:
[snip]
> What I
> am finding is that there are times where I would like to alter the queuing
> strategy of the mail. As an example, I may get in some really big emails for
> a given client that I know will take too long to deliver to them. Wh
Hi,
You have multiple options:
1.)
Read the ESMTP SIZE, then use some kind of adress rewriting to
select the queuegroup as described here:
http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.mail.sendmail/2006-05/msg00303.html
2.) Use adress rewriting to modify the sendmail routing, reroute then
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Stefan Schoeman wrote:
when the filter is done. It's almost like as if I need a MIMEDefang function
action_accept(queuename or directory) that would indicate to sendmail into
which queue to place the message. What would be even
--- On Wed, 6/10/09, Stefan Schoeman wrote:
> ...
> Basically, I run a number of relay servers that do a couple
> of things with mail (Anti Virus, Anti-Spam, Mail splits,
> funny redirects and so on). What I am finding is that there
> are times where I would like to alter the queuing strategy
> o
Hi everyone,
I've been using MIMEDefang for some years now and it is just the most
fabulous tool.
It's really the tool that allows me to take control of mail, and not
just anti-virus and anti-spam.
Thanks again David for writing this - this is really cool.
I was wondering if someone could per
12 matches
Mail list logo
