Why do the multiplexor give the above error within this code ??
eval{
$SIG{INT}=sub{$grey_insert-cancel};
alarm 10;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2010-02-02 18:21 schrieb ml ml:
What i am trying to do now is to get the required spamassassin score per
domain.
Here is my code:
http://pastebin.com/m690faaa2 (ok, this is a terrible
proof-of-concept code, but it does its job so far for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 2010-02-03 09:17 schrieb Casper Kristiansson:
Why do the multiplexor give the above error within this code ??
eval{
$SIG{INT}=sub{$grey_insert-cancel};
alarm 10;
Looks like you are
- Original Message -
From: - kd6...@yahoo.com
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang letting some spams through...why?
You missed the point. You're scanning every message with SA more than
once (at
- wrote:
Try this regex for detecting an IPv4-compatible IPv6 address:
... =~ qr/^:::(\d{1,3}(\.\d{1,3}){3})$/i ...
How about some C code rather than perl?
-- David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
Casper Kristiansson wrote:
alarm 10;
$grey_insert-execute($ip3,$sender,$recipient,$t,$t_g,$t_e,$ip,$check_mx,$check_rbl,$key,$result,$day,0,0);
return('CONTINUE', ok);
alarm 0;
Oops!!! You're returning
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Perhaps reason enough to simply use Net::IP.
What, from C? :)
As I said... patches (in C) accepted happily.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND
I see your point but I'm struggling to understand why every message is being
scanned more than once and what can I do to correct it...
Many of us told you to check your MDA configuration which we all believe to be
procmail. MTAs like sendmail normally do not save messages directly to user
- Original Message -
From: Aniruddha Barua zm...@yahoo.com
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang letting some spams through...why?
Many of us told you to check your MDA configuration which we all
I have sendmail 8.13.8 with mimedefang running. I have successfully created
a simple filter to add a recipient to outbound email for a specific sender.
I am new to mimedefang and not a wiz at perl, but can pick it up quick with
some direction.
Is there a way to parse the part of the Sender's
On Mit, 2010-02-03 at 07:01 -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
Perhaps reason enough to simply use Net::IP.
What, from C? :)
Oops, sorry, I had the impression it´s in the perl part.
Bernd
--
Bernd Petrovitsch Email : be...@petrovitsch.priv.at
I've updated sendmail to latest source 8.14 version. Compiled with latest
available mimedefang
Brian
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it.
Visit
Brian Shallenberger bri...@cleareagle.com wrote:
Is there a way to parse the part of the Sender's email address that
precedes the '@' character so I can build a recipient's email address?
For example:
Sender email address: j...@abc.com
There is of course more than one way to do it, but
Joseph Brennan wrote:
There is of course more than one way to do it, but here's one:
my ($localpart,$domainpart) = split('@',$Sender);
/me waits for D. Stussy to point out the 100+ ways that can go wrong...
But seriously, that's going to work fine in practice. I'd tweak it
just a tiny bit:
:0fw
* 50
| /usr/bin/spamc
Smoking gun...
spamc is the spamassassin command line client
Best Wishes,
Paul.
---
Paul Murphy
Head of I.T.
Argenta Discovery 2009 Ltd
Tel. 01279 645 554
Fax. 01279 645 646
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Brian Shallenberger wrote:
Sender email address: j...@abc.com
Need to get 'Joe' and make the recipient's email address: j...@abc.local
The abc.com and abc.local will not change.
The purpose is to archive email for each user
David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Joseph Brennan wrote:
There is of course more than one way to do it, but here's one:
my ($localpart,$domainpart) = split('@',$Sender);
/me waits for D. Stussy to point out the 100+ ways that can go wrong...
I learned on Usenet in 1989 that
- Original Message -
From: Paul Murphy paul.mur...@argentadiscovery.com
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang letting some spams through...why?
:0fw
* 50
| /usr/bin/spamc
Smoking gun...
spamc
Joseph Brennan wrote:
I learned on Usenet in 1989 that the way to get discussion going is
to post something that other people can correct! The more quickly
written the better.
Wow... in 1989, I learned that the way to get discussion [sic] going is
to mention guns, abortion and the Middle
Tony wrote:
I'm going around in circles here, as a beginner it's hard to understand
cryptic replies. Are you saying I should restore the above commands and
look for the 'double-scan' problem elsewhere?
No.
Here's how the mail flow works:
1) During the DATA phase of the SMTP conversation,
Sender email address: j...@abc.com
Need to get 'Joe' and make the recipient's email address: j...@abc.local
use the VIRTUSERTABLE feature within Sendmail, with an entry like this:
@abc.com%...@abc.com,%...@abc.local
Then all users at abc.com will have their mail
- Original Message -
From: David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang letting some spams through...why?
Tony wrote:
I'm going around in circles here, as a beginner
Hi,
Here's my compromise on the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address question:
if (tmp) {
if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(in6sa-sin6_addr) ||
IN6_IS_ADDR_V4COMPAT(in6sa-sin6_addr)) {
if (strchr(data-hostip, '.')) {
char
It sounds like you are trying to get the local user and that you are
assuming the first half of the email address is the username.
Instead, might be worth a caching system that uses sendmail -bv to
verify it's a local user:
For example, sendmail -bv kmcgrail-t...@pccc.com
Looks like any one of the proposed solutions would suit my needs. In this
particular scenario, the filtering sendmail server is internal to our
organization. It is the server our email clients see as the SMTP server.
I'm relaying the outbound email to our domain's 'real' SMTP server. From
this
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Paul Murphy wrote:
Sender email address: j...@abc.com
Need to get 'Joe' and make the recipient's email address: j...@abc.local
use the VIRTUSERTABLE feature within Sendmail, with an entry like this:
@abc.com %...@abc.com,%...@abc.local
I'm not sure about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I've released MIMEDefang 2.68-BETA-4. Please try it out; if all goes
well, it will become 2.68-FINAL.
Changes since 2.67 follow.
Regards,
David.
2010-02-03 David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com
* MIMEDefang 2.68-BETA-4.
* Bug fix:
---
Paul Murphy
Head of I.T.
Argenta Discovery 2009 Ltd
Tel. 01279 645 554
Fax. 01279 645 646
Kees Theunissen theun...@rijnh.nl 03/02/2010 18:45
I'm not sure about this use of multiple addresses on the RHS of the
VIRTUSERTABLE. The 'bat
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Tony t...@freeuk.com wrote:
...
ok thanks for this info David, I appreciate it and it makes
things clearer. Based on what you say I will leave things as
they are ...
NO! By leaving it, you're scanning TWICE (or more). You're not fixing the
problem.
On 2/3/2010 1:25 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
* Try hard not to lose any STDERR messages before reaping a slave.
I remember working for a company 10yrs ago where the Chief Software Scientist (my boss)
was asked by the CEO (his boss) to change the wording in the logs that stated
...killing off
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Paul Murphy paul.mur...@argentadiscovery.com wrote:
From: Paul Murphy paul.mur...@argentadiscovery.com
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Enumerate Email Address parts
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 6:10 AM
Sender email address:
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Bernd Petrovitsch be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
On Die, 2010-02-02 at 17:49 -0800, - wrote:
Try this regex for detecting an IPv4-compatible IPv6 address:
... =~ qr/^:::(\d{1,3}(\.\d{1,3}){3})$/i ...
To get even more anal: No one forbids to avoid the
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Here's my compromise on the IPv4-mapped IPv6 address question:
if (tmp) {
if (IN6_IS_ADDR_V4MAPPED(in6sa-sin6_addr) ||
IN6_IS_ADDR_V4COMPAT(in6sa-sin6_addr)) {
if (strchr(data-hostip,
Henrik K asked:
where exactly does SpamAssassin core decide anything?
This is drifting off-topic, but in the _run_file subroutine in
ArchiveIterator.pm, SA refuses to scan messages whose total size is
greater than 256 kilobytes (not 100K as I implied previously). This
is to limit the memory used
- wrote:
Comments:
if (strchr(data-hostip, '.')) {
This conditional is redundant.
No, it is not. inet_ntop does not *have* to use the form
:::a.b.c.d for IPv4-compatible addresses. It's allowed to do
that, but not mandated to. It could use :::aabb:ccdd
If an
On 2/3/2010 2:19 PM, - wrote:
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, Tonyt...@freeuk.com wrote:
...
ok thanks for this info David, I appreciate it and it makes
things clearer. Based on what you say I will leave things as
they are ...
NO! By leaving it, you're scanning TWICE (or more). You're not fixing the
--- On Wed, 2/3/10, David F. Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Date: Wednesday, February 3, 2010, 12:56 PM - wrote:
Comments:
if (strchr(data-hostip, '.')) {
This conditional is redundant.
No, it is not. inet_ntop does not *have* to use the form
:::a.b.c.d for
37 matches
Mail list logo
