Jobst Schmalenbach jo...@barrett.com.au wrote:
A number of clients (this includes thunderbird and some apple clients)
come by default sset to 465 so I guess that is one reason why I chose
this. The other point is that port 465 is an SSL channel with SMTP inside
it, so right from the start on
Is it time to propose 465 as a standard again?
Probably since 465 is the default with the latest Thunderbird if you
select SSL/TLS.
Reality and RFCs are often at odds.
Regards,
KAM
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in
On 2/18/2012 10:23 AM, Mișu Moldovan wrote:
And in that setup it was SpamAssassin doing all the heavy lifting,
which resulted in +90% of the incoming mail being rejected before
reaching the ClamAV filter. In the end I have disabled AV scanning
Funny... on my system it's the exact
Hello,
I searched the archives and in 2005-2006 it was discussed that in order to
reject during the SMTP transaction an email using action_bounce (generating a
5xx error), this was not possible since SpamAssassin would score the message
including USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO and all recipients would
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 08:55:31 -0800 (PST)
Chris Flav chris.f...@yahoo.ca wrote:
I searched the archives and in 2005-2006 it was discussed that in
order to reject during the SMTP transaction an email using
action_bounce (generating a 5xx error), this was not possible since
SpamAssassin would
I don't know where you read that, but it's wrong. If you call
action_bounce from filter_begin, filter or filter_end, the message
will not be delivered to anyone.
Regards,
Hmm. I added this block to filter_end and it only rejects email sent if none
of the recipients are listed in
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 17:24, Matt Garretson
ma...@assembly.state.ny.us wrote:
On 2/18/2012 10:23 AM, Mișu Moldovan wrote:
And in that setup it was SpamAssassin doing all the heavy lifting,
which resulted in +90% of the incoming mail being rejected before
reaching the ClamAV filter. In the
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Chris Flav chris.f...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Hmm. I added this block to filter_end and it only rejects email sent
if none of the recipients are listed in all_spam_to;
But that's because it is not actually calling action_bounce.
To do what you need: read the
To do what you need: read the mimedefang-filter page and look for
stream_by_recipient. Be very careful to discard, not bounce,
messages that have been streamed. Otherwise, you risk generating
backscatter.
Hello again,
Indeed the point of using MIMEdefang is the possibility to reject a email
9 matches
Mail list logo
