On Wednesday 25 February 2004 05:16 am, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:02:42 -0600, Andrew S. Johnson wrote:
>
> > I'm trying this, but it requires relaydb, for which I can't find a
> > Linux version, and I can't seem to get the BSD version 1.
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 07:42 pm, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Andrew S. Johnson wrote:
>
> > I'm trying this, but it requires relaydb, for which I can't find a
> > Linux version, and I can't seem to get the BSD version 1.7 to
> > compil
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 03:50 pm, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, February 24, 2004 1:52 PM -0600 "Andrew S. Johnson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had to upgrade my server from the trusty 486 to the K6 last year just
> > to support MD a
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 02:01 pm, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Andrew S. Johnson wrote:
>
> > The greylisting milter I found needs MySQL, which I don't have the
> > resources for on my current server (K6-300 w/128MB RAM). This is
> > just to kee
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 01:21 pm, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > I've spent lots of time playing with SA and various BL's, but I'm
> thinking it's at it's limits of effectiveness.
>
> NOTHING is or will be better than SpamAssassin because it is, at its core, a
> scoring system. If someone inven
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 01:36 pm, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Andrew S. Johnson wrote:
>
> > The greylisting milter I found needs MySQL, which I don't have the
> > resources for on my current server (K6-300 w/128MB RAM).
>
> MySQL is not a resou
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 12:54 pm, Cormack, Ken wrote:
> -Original Message-
> ::snip::
>
> > Basically, I'm trying to avoid drastic changes to my mail system, since
> > it generally works OK. So, the farther the changes get from sendmail,
> > theoretically changes should inflict less d
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 12:32 pm, Lucas Albers wrote:
> 1.) No spam filtering solution will catch all spam.
> Play with your SA rules or enable some blacklists.
> 2.) You should configure DSPAM as a plugin into SA.
> 3.) SA is better tested then DSPAM, imo.
> Run dspam as procmail script and se
No matter how much I keep training the SpamAssassin Bayesian
filter, it still leaks spam into my inbox. As reported on /. DSPAM
is supposed to be a better algorithm. I could just do a rip and
replace, but I'd like to keep the MimeDefang AV scanning that I
have with ClamAV. Has anyone set this up
9 matches
Mail list logo
