pl.comp.mail ]
http://www.sendmail.org/releases/8.13.0
LIBMILTER: If a milter sets the reply code to "421", the SMTP server
will terminate the SMTP session with that error.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The greatest love is a mother's, then a dog'
e end, I switched to using SMTP AUTH over
> TLS which allowed me to check the macro auth_type.
Have you tried to use FEATURE(`delay_checks') in your sendmail.mc?
Among other things it allows relaying after successful "SMTP AUTH" without
additional hacks.
URL(s):
http://www.send
owed the relay because of an entry in the access
> file, e.g.:
>
> kam.is-a-geek.comRELAY
The above access entry for dyndns *WILL NOT* work -
it requires "closed PTR-A" loop to be effective.
[ I have checked there is no such "closed loop" ]
What do you wan
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> Could you suggest another free email account/service for sending to
>> mailing lists?
>
> Can't you run your own SMTP server?
Not for "personal" purposes.
> Or try Hotmail/Yahoo/pobox.c
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
> > [...]
> By the way, your outbound SMTP server 213.180.147.167 has a rather
> poor reputation. We've been running the Reputation Reporting Protocol
> with several hundred sensors for a few months now and we
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> IMHO you should "generalize" support for different signature types
>> e.g. 1 extra byte for signature length and 1 extra byte for signature type
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "signat
1 extra byte for signature length and 1 extra byte for signature type
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The Almighty in His infinite wisdom did not see fit to create Frenchmen
in the image of Englishmen.
-- Winston Churchill, 1942
___
>
> Anyway... if you're interested in contributing, please contact me
> off-list.
For my curiosity:
It is intended to be more white-list or black-list?
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The Lord prefers common-looking people.
That is the reason that He makes
address on one of their lists, then
>> you've caught them violating your request. It's still unsolicited, so
>> it's valid data.
>
> Other option is to raise hell with the mail outsourcing company but does
> that really work?
Have you tried to report every such
actively subscribing
> someone is a no-no.
But actively un-subscribing not subscribed email addresses is OK
=> as far as I have heard the effect is almost identical :-)
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The road to hell is paved with NAND gates.
-- J. Gooding
_
ciency (valid recipients are cached for 24h; invalid ones for
> 1h.)
>
> Yeah, way more overhead than /etc/mail/access, but in this case it is
> worth it.
Have you ever hit performance problems caused by access table being to
big to be cached in memory?
[sendmail can do 30+ access lookups
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>>> Unfortunately, many aggressive anti-spam techniques that are perfectly
>>> usable for BOFHs on personal servers don't scale up to real systems
>>> with real users. :-(
>
>> You ha
erver.
>
> Unfortunately, many aggressive anti-spam techniques that are perfectly
> usable for BOFHs on personal servers don't scale up to real systems
> with real users. :-(
You have assumed "no secondary MX", have not you?
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip
ot;internal hosts" under the same netmaster control
does not break "the spirit" of the RFC.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
British education is probably the best in the world, if you can survive it.
If you can't there is nothing left for you but the dipl
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> Have you used it for standard maps? (e.g. access or virtusertable)
>
> Yes.
>
>> YES => Have you tried to reduce (horrible) number of lookups issued by
>> "any map" sendmail.c
We tend to concentrate our optimizations on medium-sized
> installations, by which I mean about 25 msgs/second (= about 2
> million/day) or higher. The low-end ones aren't worth worrying about
> just because the load is easily managed.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...
s with "administratively prohibited"?
AFAIK sendmail does not distinguish between reasons why establishing TCP
connection have failed. Have I missed something?
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
A commune is where people join
t;avoiding accumulating excessive evidence" :-)
[ I use trapped spam to send abuse reports via spamcop.net ]
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
Your manuscript is both good and original, but the part that is good is not
original and the part that is original is not good.
Matt Garretson wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>> I want custom "rate limiter" on my spamtrap,
>
> Another idea, if you run linux with iptables, is using
> the netfilter "recent" module to block over-enthusiastic
> hosts at the network layer.
>
&g
o high for "very low on
resources (CPU/memory) host serving "second life" as spamtrap.
* Mimedefang filters out "too much" *as for spamtrap* :-)
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
Our business in life is not to succeed
but to continue to fail in hig
*fails* to declare
charset used in message header. Quite a few mail server "fills" missing
charset for non ascii messages
=> You may consider providing links (to microsoft web pages) for
properly *fixing* it
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
He is not only
let the postfix user to communicate with it. Is
> there any parameters i missed for this ? adding some sleep 10; chmod
> 770 and chgrp postfix to the socket seems...weird to me :)
Add "postfix" user to "defang" group.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a..
ld never force the removal of Postfix.
According to Debian site mimedefang package for stable (lenny) sendmail
at "recommends" list:
http://packages.debian.org/lenny/mimedefang
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
They spell it "da Vinci" and pronounce it &quo
t; fills missing charset the guessing fails.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The only problem with seeing too much is that it makes you insane.
-- Phaedrus
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
me
eliver some (small)
messages via "instant SMTP" and other (*BIG*) messages via
"UUCP over TCP". The remote site used "dialup modem speed" connection.
UUCP uses *single* TCP connection so it did not suck all bandwidth of
the remote side during multi h
re that socket maps can be pretty
> slow. We used to use socket maps to control mail routing on our
> commercial appliances, but quickly went back to Berkeley DB files for
> performance.
Have you considered "pushing" "socket map over UDP (over unix socket)"
into sendmai
You can fill $={VirtHost} "directly":
LOCAL_CONFIG
C{VirtHost}example.net
P.S.
The topic has been discussed a few times plus in news:comp.mail.sendmail
Search for the threads with _VIRTUSER_STOP_ONE_LEVEL_RECURSION_
[it marks one recipe but you will find references to other by the way]
--
[pl>en
f the recipient) is required.
Secret/private key (of sender) is required for *signing*.
> [...]
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu
The time spent on any item of the agenda [of a finance committee] will be
in inverse proportion to the sum involved.
-- C. N. Parkinso
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> Anyway SpamAssassin avoids "one socket per one DNS query" it its DNS
>> lookups perl package
>
> This is true. On the other hand, it replaces a 75-line function with
> 1473 lines of perl.
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> If you prefer performance perspective:
>> It means needless system calls.
>
> That's a micro-optimization. Have you ever measured SpamAssassin's
> performance? Trying to avoid opening 3 o
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> 2) As I understand relay_is_blacklisted_multi uses Net::DNS bgsend
>>"guilty" of horrible wasting of sockets.
>
> One socket per domain that you check against... not a big deal.
> On a bus
showing errors.
>
> Thanks for any help.
1) Does $Features{"Net::DNS"} return zero [module absent] or undef
[no detect attempt]?
2) As I understand relay_is_blacklisted_multi uses Net::DNS bgsend
"guilty" of horrible wasting of sockets.
--
[pl>en: Andrew] An
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
>
>> What is the recommended way of storing "per SMTP session" data in
>> MIMEdefang filtering script?
>
>> e.g. to make one "RCPT TO:" check pass data to next "RCPT TO:" check
What is the recommended way of storing "per SMTP session" data in
MIMEdefang filtering script?
e.g. to make one "RCPT TO:" check pass data to next "RCPT TO:" check
a) in the same transaction (per message)
b) in the same SMTP session (per SMTP session)
--
[pl>e
e time to take a look and
confirm) is quite unlike "standard delivery" (IMHO).
It would break the letter but not the spirit (IMHO).
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl
You get what you pay for.
-- Gabriel Biel
_
he idea is to
a) make sender seen the message as rejected
b) allow recipient to report spam delivery attempt
[with spam messages delivered to special folder]
--
[pl>en: Andrew] Andrzej Adam Filip : a...@onet.eu : a...@xl.wp.pl
I am a conscientious man, when I throw rocks at seabirds I
36 matches
Mail list logo
