Cormack, Ken wrote:
> content of the message... a spam in the form of a bitmap image? The
> subject, too, is typically one or two random words meant to sneak past a
> bayes engine.
>
> Have been seeing a number of these lately here, and I'm wondering if anyone
> has ideas how best to go about bloc
First, thanks for all the responses so far. I'm going to Keep It Simple
for now and just use a config file rather than a database. Our user
base is small enough that we can handle this through requests sent to
the IT staff.
Dirk the Daring wrote:
>Since you mention NetWare, is it a good idea
Background: I have MIMEDefang running (with multiplexor and embedded
Perl interpreter) on a Linux box that serves, by way of a mailertable,
as an MX for another server. This second server runs Netware, hosts
the actual mailboxes, and provides pop service.
Whether or not you think it's a good ide
John Kennedy wrote:
In short:
I've added $SALocalTestsOnly = 0
I know both sa-mimedefang.cf and mimedefang-filter are being used
Standalone tests from "defang" user show razor checks
I see no evidence of razor checks added to headers/reports
I don't see t
More detective work. Same system as with the last problem:
Centos 3.6 Linux box, and some version information relevant to this problem:
mimedefang-2.55
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0
MIME-tools-5.419
MIME::QuotedPrint 3.07
MIME-Base64-3.07
I have mimedefang up and running on the test box. I oc
David Eisner wrote:
When I turn on the embed flag, I have two problems.
1. mimedefang-multiplexor[24534]: WARNING: Something in your Perl
filter appears to have opened a file descriptor outside of any
function
2. mimedefang-multiplexor[24534]: Slave 0 stderr: dns: sendto()
failed: at
I setup Mimedefang 2.55 with SpamAssassin 3.1.0 on a non-production
Centos 3.6 Linux box. The machine in question has only 128MB of RAM, so
I'd like to get the embedded interpreter working. Also, this is how the
production version will be configured (not the 128MB RAM part, though :-).
When
Arthur Corliss wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, David Eisner wrote:
>
>
>
>>I just received an interesting virus. It's a fake bounce with an
>>attachment named letter.zip. It made it through mimedefang (2.49)
>>unscathed.
>>
>>I unzipped l
I just received an interesting virus. It's a fake bounce with an
attachment named letter.zip. It made it through mimedefang (2.49)
unscathed.
I unzipped letter.zip, which contained a single file, named . . .
letter.zip (kind of like Russian dolls).
I unzipped the interior letter.zip, which conta
In order to facilitate filtering mail with Outlook's
Rules Wizard, I'm changing the X-Spam-Score: header
format from
X-Spam-Score: 6.136 (**) BAYES_50,BIZ_TLD,...
to
X-Spam-Score: ** 6.136 BAYES_50,BIZ_TLD,...
by modifying the action_change_header( "X-Spam-Score"..) call
in mimede
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Henrik Schmiediche wrote:
> > What is the advantage to Embedding Perl in the muliplexor?
>
> Faster startup time and much less memory use.
The man mimedefang-multiplexor man page says:
-E Specifies that the multiplexor shoul
BACKGROUND
I'm currently testing MIMEDefang 2.42 on a PC running Red Hat 9
with just 128 MB of RAM (too little for a production server, obviously).
I'm using SpamAssasin 2.63 and Razor 2.40. Only my mail is going
through the "server".
I ran into a situation where somebody comment-spammed my bl
Hi. I've setup MIMEDefang 2.42 and SpamAssassin 2.63
on a Red Hat 9 box, and I'm tring to get things working.
When I run spamassassin by hand as the defang user, it seems
to be doing the bayes check. But when it's run by mimedefang,
it doesn't seem to be working (I haven't seen a spamassasin
repo
13 matches
Mail list logo
