I've seen a few uncaught spams lately with ALL_TRUSTED scored.
I see that this is determined by a function called check_all_trusted(),
but my Perl isn't good enough to work out how this flag is determined.
Mails are delivered direct via SMTP, not relayed from anywhere, so I
don't see that there
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday, 17. May 2006 11:46, Jim Hatfield wrote:
The machine has 1Gb of swap space and all it does now is mail
You seem to have ulimits set at around 32MB.
Hmm, I didn't think so. It's FreeBSD box, the /etc/login.conf
is stock:
:datasize=unlimited
Paul Murphy wrote:
Dirk Mueller wrote:
On Wednesday, 17. May 2006 11:46, Jim Hatfield wrote:
The machine has 1Gb of swap space and all it does now is mail
You seem to have ulimits set at around 32MB.
Hmm, I didn't think so. It's FreeBSD box, the /etc/login.conf
is stock:
Then you have
I've noticed this happening from time to time,
both at work and at home:
May 17 10:20:51 field mimedefang-multiplexor[536]: Slave 1 stderr: Out of
memory during request for 23160 bytes, total sbrk() is 27359232 bytes!
May 17 10:20:51 field mimedefang-multiplexor[536]: Slave 1 died prematurely
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:54:09 +0100, in local.mimedefang you wrote:
On 18/08/05, Jim Hatfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything I can do to let it through short of temporarily
reconfiguring sendmail to not use the mimedefang milter?
Try increasing the timeout from 1 minute to, say, 3
I noticed this on our mail gateway:
Aug 18 16:33:03 highland sm-mta[90484]: j7IFVIUt090484: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x.xx, size=17502984, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=OFDB523FBE.8807D4B2-ON
[EMAIL PROTECTED], proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay
=mail.iss-data.dk [195.212.23.130]
Aug 18 16:34:05
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 23:57:00 +0100, in local.mimedefang you wrote:
I've installed Spam Assassin and MIMEDefang with Sendmail and everything
is working well. However I would like Spam Assassin to tell Sendmail to
Reject Spam on the connection. Instead of accepting the spam and
marking it so
I had some problems after a recent upgrade. Removing and reinstalling
everything, including all the Perl modules, still leaves me with one:
Jun 20 11:43:18 highland mimedefang-multiplexor[89044]: Slave 1 stderr: Failed
to run DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL RBL SpamAssassin test, skipping: (Can't call
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 16:31:51 +0100, in local.mimedefang you wrote:
I am about to upgrade my mail filters and I would like a quick way to
revert back to the previous environement. For regular backups, we use
Tivoli Storage Manager, but it is a pain in the butt for recovery of
other
than a few
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 19:57:54 +0100, in local.mimedefang you wrote:
is now being transmitted multiple times. That wouldn't be a problem
with
greylisting after the RCPT TO command, but too many folks use nasty
Novell
Groupwise for me to get away with that.
I'm just experimenting with adding
I didn't appreciate that stream_by_recipient causes mail
to be accepted before the validity of the recipient addresses
has been checked. It seems that if any of the recipient
addresses are invalid, instead of errors being generated at
the original rcpt to phase, they don't show up until the
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 13:28:29 - , in local.mimedefang you wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Jim Hatfield wrote:
Then what I want to do is to call action_bounce if there are no
recipients left. But how can I do that if delete_recipient doesn't
change the Recipients array?
You need to do your own
This might be obvious to many but it wasn't to me. If you
use stream_by_recipient, the original mail is accepted. So if
you subsequently call action_bounce, bounce mails get generated.
I'm migrating from a scheme where spamassassin is handled
separately to one where it is invoked by MIMEDefang,
I'm not clear whether filter_recipient() is called once for
each envelope recipient, or just once. The implication is
that it's called for each but I'd like to be sure.
Also, does a return of REJECT reject just that recipient?
In the following transaction:
mail from:
rcpt to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo
