Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I believe an MX was designed as a Mail Gateway record for machines not
directly connected to the network. Therefore, since an A record is
for machines that are connected to the network, an A record should be
enough to allow for mail to be delivered.
I know in practice
If you are using the freebsd ports system, you can upgrade your clamav
installation using portupgrade (which can be installed
from /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade). Simply edit
your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf file and add:
MAKE_ARGS = {
'security/clamav' = 'CLAMAVUSER=mailnull
Hi all,
I just upgraded my clamav (freebsd, ports) and again, it changed the
permissions on some of it's directories and caused it to not start as
user 'mailnull' (the same user that sendmail and mimedefang run as). I
would rather let clamd run as the user it wants to (clamav user) and
Lee Dilkie wrote:
Sorry for an SA question on a MD list but google didn't turn
up anything.
http://www.spamassassin.org/
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
(I'm pretty sure this has come up in the SA archives at least once.)
Question. What is the default whitelist? Where
Sorry for an SA question on a MD list but google didn't turn up anything.
I just got a piece of spam with a low SA score. It would have been high except for a
USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST entry in the list which I didn't recognise.
grepping through my disk yielded that test in
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lucas
Albers
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend
Jeff Grossman said:
[better] alternative to db_file with some of the
I implemented this using the access.db feature of Sendmail,
with scripts
every five minutes scanning the logs and adding new entries.
Any particular reason for doing it this way vs. implementing something
within the mimedefang-filter to do it real-time much as greylisting
does? I'm asking
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 4.9, I upgraded to perl 5.8.4 (from 5.8.2), using the suggestions
in the ports UPDATING, hopefully recompliing everything that depended on perl. SA had
a minor upgrade at the same time (2.63_1 - 2.63_2).
Anyway, I restarted MD and my logs contain..
Jun 5 15:40:18
I have tried running clamd as user defang, but clamd won't
then start.
check clamav.conf.
the location of the pid file must be writable by the defang user as clamd is
running as dfang.
I have added the user defang to the group clamav, but I
get errors when
sending/receiving mail saying
What FreeBSD port did you upgrade from? You may want to identify that
section and look at the FreeBSD port revision history, checking each
of the changes that have happened since. It should make for a nice
checklist of things that have changed.
http://www.freshports.org/security/clamav/
Lee Dilkie wrote:
Is it a requirement that mimedefang/sendmail and clamd all
run as the same
user?
AFAIK, yes. Never been able to get it to run any other way.
Think its a socket's permission thing.
Jon
--
well if that's the case then that explains it I'm somewhat new
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul
Murphy
The problem is that the documentation suggests that you
enable the two options,
and sit back and watch the database being built as e-mail comes in.
The reality is that the two options
12 matches
Mail list logo
