Re: [Mimedefang] OT: Blocking because of MX to 127.0.0.1

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Joseph Brennan wrote: > > > Our solution was to block incoming connections from 127.0.0.1 on the > > servers. Is there ever a need to accept TCP connections from localhost > > for mail? > > > Yes. That's how the sendmail daemon gets mail from local processes. [snip] Aaaa,

Re: [Mimedefang] About to give up on mimedefang under Redhat Linux 9

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Steve Pfister wrote: > I'd really like to get mimedefang working under Redhat Linux 9, but I'm > about ready to give up. I've tried installing a couple of times, but every > time I run it, I get > > Mar 4 18:30:31 colima mimedefang-multiplexor: Reap: Idle slave 0 (pid > 21943

[Mimedefang] Changing subject

Hi All Need to pointers please. In filter_end I have changed action_change_header from: ("X-Spam-Score", "$hits ($score) $names); to: ("Subject","$hits ($score) $Subject","1") in an attempt to show the spam score on the subject line. What happens is that a 'new' header shows up with what I want

Re: [Mimedefang] How to best populate a spamtrap?

David and all Maybe change that to *any* website. Then wait. tod On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, David F. Skoll wrote: > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Martin Bene wrote: > > > Any ideas how to best get this address used by spammers? > > Put the address on a busy web site. Post from it to Usenet. Wait. > > Re

[Mimedefang] return action_discard()

Hi all Luckly I am in a country that permits me to delete eMail with virii. Does that make my government smart? < could be another can of worms. Anyway, I would like to send users some sort of notification that a virus email was deleted. I currently discard those emails and was thinking tha