Hi all,
I know it's not directly relevant, but since everyone here is using
Sendmail[1] it probably affects you, so I hope David doesn't mind.
As documented, if you have multiple queue directories (e.g.,
/var/spool/mqueue/qdir00, qdir01, qdir02, etc), and QueueDirectory
specification that ha
David F. Skoll wrote:
2) And controversially: A change to the slave-scheduling algorithm.
In previous versions, when the multiplexor went to pick a slave to do
work, it picked the oldest available slave, where "age" is measured by
how long ago the slave process was started.
It might be worth c
Trevor wrote:
Hi,
I'm running 2 X sun Fire V210 2X 1GHz CPU's with 2GB RAM. Running
Sendmail-Mimedefang-SpamAssassin.
I have a MAX of 20 processes using Embed Pearl.
What determines the memory sise of each process many people on this list
have 20-30mb sizes mine on the other hand are around 75
David,
David F. Skoll wrote:
Stephen Ford wrote:
I'm running Solaris 9 on a dual processor 220R with 2
gigs of ram and the box is having trouble keeping up
with spam!?!?
I hate to say this, but switch from SPARC to a commodity Intel box.
Intel and AMD chips far outperform SPARC for the kind o
Hi all,
We're seeing repeated instances of
MXCommand: connect: Connection refused: Is multiplexor running?
[...]
mfconnect: Error communicating with multiplexor
on our content filtering farm. Once MD starts logging these it never
seems to recover, and while it still processes some m
All,
Here's a(nother) sendmail patch (against 8.13.4) for review.
[ I realise this isn't directly MIMEDefang related, but I figure the
audience here is likely to find this useful. If not, please let me know
I'll refrain from posting these here ]
http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/change
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
As an example, I've rewritten suggested-minimum-filter-for-windows-clients
into separate modules, and made that available here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc/mimedefang-modular/
I like that a lot. That's quite close to the sort of thing I had in
mind, bar a few detail
Hi all,
This isn't strictly MimeDefang related, but it does fix a milter-related
bug with Sendmail, and it can make access_db rejections more efficient,
so I thought I'd pass it on for comment and review.
This patch (to Sendmail 8.13.4)
http://jc.ngo.org.uk/trac-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/269
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote:
Except... um, what is "SpamReportAddress" supposed to do, anyway?
Add a header with the correct address to report spam to, to each
incoming email?
It's a hypothetical module that reads an e-mail address from its config
file (or a 'SpamReportAddress' section of the mime
David F. Skoll wrote:
Nik Clayton wrote:
Any interest in a community effort around this? Last time I looked at
this I got as far as pulling MD in to my public Subversion repository so
I could branch it and start noodling around. No noodling has happened
yet, but I'd like something like th
David F. Skoll wrote:
This is on our roadmap... eventually...
We've just gone through massive pain to reorganize CanIt into proper
Perl modules that are maintainable, easy to separate, and modular.
We made the effort because CanIt is paying the bills.
Eventually, we plan on a complete revamp of MIM
Paul Whittney wrote:
However, I hit the same issue, multiple config files, with slightly
different functionality, or a complete lack of certain functions. I
actually had more trouble with revision control of the ziptest parts,
the actual "defang notice", boilerplate additions, and the changes to
t
Hi all,
I'm thinking out loud here.
I've got a number of different systems running MimeDefang, grouped in to
'classes'. Each system in the same class has identical functionality,
and some, but not all, functionality can be shared by different classes.
At the moment each class has a custom mimed
13 matches
Mail list logo
