Re: [Mimedefang] blocking | and bad syntax in "from" address

2004-06-18 Thread Paul Heinlein
owe's milter-spamc rejects such things with "553 5.1.[37]" errors. I've never looked at his code, but it seems to work decently on my home mail server (which doesn't need mimedefang's flexibility). --Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___

Re: [Mimedefang] OT: adaptec scsi card help with fedora

2004-04-29 Thread Paul Heinlein
27;s a known issue, but the workarounds aren't guaranteed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/long_list.cgi?buglist=107880 --Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list

Re: [Mimedefang] Digest::SHA1 failing

2004-03-19 Thread Paul Heinlein
n your $PATH and the perl being used by MIMEDefang one and the same? I.e., is there a /usr/local/bin/perl that different from /usr/bin/perl? -- Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca M

Re: [Mimedefang] Check this X-header out

2004-03-15 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Ben Kamen wrote: > I'll edit my rules... This works for me: score HABEAS_SWE 0.0 --Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL P

RE: [Mimedefang] About to give up on mimedefang under RedhatLinux 9

2004-03-12 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Steve Pfister wrote: > I seem to have UTF-8... here's my /etc/sysconfig/i18n: > > LANG="en_US.UTF-8" > SUPPORTED="en_US.UTF-8:en_US:en" > SYSFONT="latarcyrheb-sun16" > > What should I change it to?

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting problem with the default confTO_COMMAND

2004-02-27 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which RFC(s) do these timeouts violate? RFC 1123, section 5.3.2. -- Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting problem with the default confTO_COMMAND

2004-02-27 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Which RFC(s) do these timeouts violate? RFC 1123, section 5.3.2. -- Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Mimedefang] Replacing SpamAssassin with DSPAM

2004-02-24 Thread Paul Heinlein
-- but once MySQL is installed, it won't be a significant drain on your system resources. --Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://

Re: [Mimedefang] Incredible spam obfuscation

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Joseph Brennan wrote: > # note iframe, script, object > if (/<(iframe|script|object) /i) { > $badtag = $1; > $_ =~ s/<(iframe|script|object) / } > $bla .= $_; Would it be h

RE: [Mimedefang] Calling Spamassassin on outgoing only

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Paul Heinlein wrote: > We do something similar. A pseudo-code version would look something > like > > IF message originates on our subnets BUT NOT on a secondary mx > THEN invoke spamassassin Ack. I got it exactly backwards. It should be IF message or

RE: [Mimedefang] Calling Spamassassin on outgoing only

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Heinlein
= 1; [...] We do something similar. A pseudo-code version would look something like IF message originates on our subnets BUT NOT on a secondary mx THEN invoke spamassassin --Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.o

Re: [Mimedefang] rejecting on helo,drive-by-relay,forged_sender,

2004-01-16 Thread Paul Heinlein
itto with my vanity domain. That way, all mail goes out through the "right" mail server. Most mail clients support that sort of functionality these days. -- Paul Heinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://w