On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:15:13 +0200
Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
> > Exactly what is the point behind DMARC?
>
> Try talking to an organization that has a serious phishing problem.
>
> > "Therefore, why reinvent the wheel?"
>
> I'm sure glad someone did, or we would all still be using this:
> http:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:11:21 -0700
wrote:
>
> --- On Wed, 3/20/13, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> > Ever see one of these?--
> >
> > To: Joe B
> > 'cvml','j...@columbia.edu');>>
> >
> > I changed the name and address, but otherwise this is what ...
>
> Since when is JavaScript valid in SMTP heade
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:16:08 +0100
"tonj" wrote:
> thanks for your feedback on this and I've been using your suggested code in
> my md filter for a few days but html mail is still coming through as normal.
> This is my md filter:
>
> # Detect and load Perl modules
> detect_and_load_perl_modules(
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:39:06 +0100
"tonj" wrote:
> > That's exactly what I told you in my message posted to the list on Fri Jun
> > > 4 00:43:33 EDT 2010 in response to your first message titled "filtering >
> > html email".
> >
> > Why didn't you listen?
>
> it isn't that I didn't listen, I d
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 16:50:55 -0400
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Jason Bertoch wrote:
>
> > May be time to introduce code that stops signing outbound mail when
> > the contract lapses :)
>
> Hah... not so easy, though. But yeah, we probably should (or
> have it signed rudely:
>
> "X-Scanned-By: C
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:47:54 -0500
"David F. Skoll" wrote:
> Joseph Brennan wrote:
>
> > I was baiting you :-)
it should work :D)
> The HTTP hop from end user to Gmail's webmail
> > server is not SMTP, so it's not covered by RFC 2821.
>
> Well, RFC 5321 says:
>
>When forwarding a messag
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:50:52 -
"Tony" wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "-"
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 12:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] mimedefang letting some spams through...why?
>
>
> >Your problem is that SA is being called more than once.
>
> ok thanks,
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:25:08 -0600
"Cliff Hayes" wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> I was checking the beginning of mimedefang.pl per your suggestion and
> noticed this:
>
> $SALocalTestsOnly = 1;
>
> I assume this is being overriden by this in sa-mimedefang.cf ...
>
> use_razor2 1
> use_pyzor 1
> use_dcc
Le mardi 5 décembre 2006 11:52, Kees Theunissen a écrit :
> On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
> > Given the recent run of messages that contain just a short number, I'm
> > inclined
> > to reject any message that contains a body of less than 20-40 bytes as
> > being a
> > nuisance. Doe
Le mercredi 8 novembre 2006 16:24, David F. Skoll a écrit :
> Marco Meier wrote:
>
> > i think the mimedefang-filter manpage should be changed according to
> > this. It says: "This lets you reject connections after the HELO/EHLO
> > SMTP command.". In fact, they aren't rejected right there.
>
> A
Le vendredi 20 octobre 2006 14:47, Gary McLean a écrit :
> I will be out of the office starting 20/10/2006 and will not return until
> 23/10/2006.
>
> I will respond to your message when I return.
>
> If you require urgent assistance, please IT Support on 8777
that's funny, now let's test if th
Le samedi 14 octobre 2006 19:25, Barton L. Phillips a écrit :
> renaud pascal wrote:
> > Please, give infos on your setup (hardware and MTA) and maybe
> > someone in the list will recognize a situation he already had to
> > tame (and maybe succeeded to overcome) !
> Thank
Le vendredi 13 octobre 2006 19:19, Barton L. Phillips a écrit :
> Can mimedefang be run nice? Mimedefang with SpamAssassin take a lot of
> horse power and are slowing down my system from time to time.
Do you have RAM and did you try and use it for the MD tmp ?
Do you have connection rate and
Le mardi 19 juillet 2005 21:49, Johann a écrit :
>
> Renaud PASCAL wrote:
> >
> > Well, not exactly the same slices, and not in the same cols/rows order,
> > also, hum, let's say "the beautifying is quite rough" ...
> > but it may give you a st
Le mercredi 30 août 2006 03:32, Kenneth Porter a écrit :
> --On Tuesday, August 29, 2006 1:54 PM +0100 Carl Pickering
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've seen in the archives, that I can set mimedefang to read a
...
> > Or do I need to change this elsewhere?
>
> Don't know, but you may not n
Le mercredi 23 août 2006 17:25, Yanick Quirion a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm using sendmail with mimedefang. I'm having problem with spammers
> that sends an e-mail to un user that doesn't exist on my organization.
> The server will send a "user unknown" it the sender, but if the sender
> e-mail address
Le Mardi 19 Juillet 2005 21:49, Johann a écrit :
>
> Renaud PASCAL wrote:
> >
> > Well, not exactly the same slices, and not in the same cols/rows order,
> > also, hum, let's say "the beautifying is quite rough" ...
> > but it may give you a st
Le Jeudi 14 Juillet 2005 17:19, Matthew Thomas a écrit :
> Does anyone have a script written to loop through mail logs and return
> the number of spams (via spamassassin) categorized by hits?
>
> For example:
>
> Hits: Count:
> 5-7 1234
> 7.01-9 2345
> 9.01-12 3456
>
>
Le Jeudi 28 Avril 2005 15:28, David F. Skoll a écrit :
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > (echo "From `cat SENDER | tr -d '<>'` `date`"; cat ENTIRE_MESSAGE) >
> > message.mbox && mutt -f message.mbox
>
> That works nicely if you've had the foresight to use
> action_quarantine_entire_message(). If y
Le Dimanche 13 Mars 2005 22:50, David F. Skoll a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Steve Sizemore wrote:
>
> > However, I still don't understand how this failure can shut down
> > mimedefang altogether.
>
> If there's any weirdness with the virus scanner, then by default,
> MIMEDefang tempfails the
Le Mercredi 16 Février 2005 15:20, Keith Patton a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> I thought I saw a excerpt on this list on a method to only virus scan
> files smaller than a certain size... ( assuming that large files are ok )
> And can't find it anywhere.. Does anyone have a filter to do such?
Here
Le Jeudi 16 Décembre 2004 16:32, Administrador DyR a écrit :
> El jue, 16-12-2004 a las 15:12 +0100, Renaud PASCAL escribió:
> > Le Jeudi 16 Décembre 2004 13:58, Administrador DyR a écrit :
> > > In my firm, we would like to introduce HTML in the
> > > replacing
Le Jeudi 16 Décembre 2004 13:58, Administrador DyR a écrit :
> In my firm, we would like to introduce HTML in the replacing-attachment,
Ouch !
> and translating the name (some of our customers don't open
> "warning1.txt" thinking it's a mail-virus, or something so).
Hum, and these `customers
Le Mardi 14 Décembre 2004 14:01, Ronald Vazquez NLM a écrit :
> I can understand the reasons for doing this the way all you guys suggest
> but my manager wants it done his way. Could someone please help?
Well, sure, plug your manager in port 25 and/or live wire.
Next problem ?-)
Anyway, j
Le Jeudi 23 Septembre 2004 11:44, Bill Maidment a écrit :
> Paul Murphy wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > See
> > http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-September/024
> >386.html - I looked into this a while back, and it seems to be due to a
> > bug in the code.
> >
> > The solution is to
Le mercredi 25 Février 2004 15:55, Paul Murphy a écrit :
> Sorry, you're confusing me with the original poster
Exactly !
I think I really need to take these 3 years of vacation I'm late on :D)
> - I just did a
> sanity check on your post because I didn't recognise the MY_DSL rule
> which had bee
Le mercredi 25 Février 2004 12:05, Paul Murphy a écrit :
> system, and got:
> >X-Spam-Debug: Checked, hits=2.735 required=5 tests=HTML_20_30,
> >HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_06,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY
> >version=2.63
>
> What is the "MY_DSL" rule doing?
There :
header MY_DSL Received =~ /\.atlanta
Le mercredi 25 Février 2004 00:51, Matthew Rossiter a écrit :
> I can't seem to stop these emails. The come from all over the place
> and they always contain something like this.
Well, just on *your* message including the small quote
you made off the original spam I get this score and
it doesn't
Le mercredi 11 Février 2004 16:41, Brent J. Nordquist a écrit :
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Michael Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rawbody SA_CUSTOM_TINY_FONT /font-size:\s*[01]\s*(?:p[xt])?\s*;/i
> > describe SA_CUSTOM_TINY_FONT HTML message contains unreadable font
> > size scoreSA_CUSTOM_TI
29 matches
Mail list logo
