Am Di, den 07.09.2004 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED] um 16:46:
> sounds like a candidate for the MimeDefang FAQ!
> PLEASE READ: The information contained in this email is confidential
> and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended
[...]
Sorry, your information is too conf
sounds like a candidate for the MimeDefang FAQ!
> > > MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
> > > 0x1f does not fulfill action requirements 0x3f
>
> You have linked against a newer version of libmilter than the one your
> Sendmail binary supports.
>
PLEASE READ: The information containe
David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Matt Smith wrote:
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:53:18 +0200, "The Searcher"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
0x1f does not fulfill action requirements 0x3f
You have linked against a newer version of libmilter
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Matt Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:53:18 +0200, "The Searcher"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
> > 0x1f does not fulfill action requirements 0x3f
You have linked against a newer version of libmilter than the one your
Sendmai
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:53:18 +0200, "The Searcher"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mimedefang starts without any problems, but when a mail arrives in the
queue it's not processed by the milter and the syslog reports folowing:
>
> MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
> 0x1f does not fulfill acti
Hi,
Mimedefang starts without any problems, but when a mail arrives in the queue it's not
processed by the milter and the syslog reports folowing:
MIMEDefang-2.44: st_optionneg[1090857776]:
0x1f does not fulfill action requirements 0x3f
Below is a detailed log.
I'm running
Red Hat 9
Sendmail
6 matches
Mail list logo