Hi there,
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, David F. Skoll wrote:
4. ClamAV effectiveness (was Re: MIMEDefang Digest, Vol 132, Issue 3)
Oops. Sorry about that. :/
Mr. Skoll also wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:33:44 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
In my opinion ClamAV is more or less useless for any
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:17:13 -0500
Richard Laager wrote:
> Is there a virus scanner you'd recommend for use with MIMEDefang on
> Linux?
No, not really. I'd recommend not running Windows which reduces your
exposure to viruses by 99%.
And rather than any sort of virus scanner, I'd simply block a
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 12:45 -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> ClamAV has become almost completely useless since the
> Sourcefire and then Cicso acquisition. It's a fine engine, but signatures
> are awful.
Is there a virus scanner you'd recommend for use with MIMEDefang on
Linux?
--
Richard
signa
On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:33:44 +0100 (BST)
"G.W. Haywood" wrote:
> In my opinion ClamAV is more or less useless for anything other than
> the phishing signatures etc. for which I use it.
Seconded. ClamAV has become almost completely useless since the
Sourcefire and then Cicso acquisition. It's a
Hallo, Andrew,
Du meintest am 11.10.13:
> I have to agree that ClamAV seems well behind other software
> packages.
> I do get a numbers of attachments e-mail to me which I then check via
> https://www.virustotal.com and they are then reported as a virus.
I'd first test for "*.exe" or "zipped *
I have to agree that ClamAV seems well behind other software packages.
I do get a numbers of attachments e-mail to me which I then check via
https://www.virustotal.com and they are then reported as a virus.
ClamAV is open source so I guess it does a good job for us people who
can't purchase
DFS wrote on 10/10/2013 12:08:04 PM:
> Has anyone noticed that ClamAV does a pretty poor job lately of
> catching viruses? Here are a few days' worth of statistics from a
> reasonably-busy mail server cluster:
Not seeing it being caught by Symantec or McAfee on mail servers behind
our CanIt sys
Hi, all,
Has anyone noticed that ClamAV does a pretty poor job lately of
catching viruses? Here are a few days' worth of statistics from a
reasonably-busy mail server cluster:
Total messages scanned: 25 814 586
Viruses detected by ClamAV: 32 147
Viruses missed b
8 matches
Mail list logo
