-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Ben Kamen wrote:
And the problems outlook has with IMAP people
attribute to IMAP...
I don't want to defend Outlook, neither Courier, but:
http://www.courier-mta.org/fud/
esp. the Epilogue.
Actually, I use IMAP myself, but
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:05:21PM -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 23, 2007 1:36 PM -0900 Matthew Schumacher
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This doesn't work because most of the people using the mail system use
POP3. I would love for people to ditch pop3, but due to poor
Am Mittwoch Januar 24 2007 11:04 schrieb Jan-Pieter Cornet:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap,
right, give new config in their clients :-)
and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
On 1/24/07, Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
Outlook Express has had IMAP support since at least
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
I've use Outlook Express on a daily basis for many years (8+ I'm thinking)
using only IMAP protocol. It's got
Rob MacGregor wrote:
On 1/24/07, Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
the way they store and view email. And last I heard Eudora and
Outlook Express still didn't support imap anyway...
Outlook Express has had IMAP
Matthew Schumacher wrote:
Outlook Express has had IMAP support since at least v4.
Yea, and it's terrible.
I concurr.
And the problems outlook has with IMAP people
attribute to IMAP...
When I was on the IMAP mailing list..
several people brought up those kinds of issues with some
amount of
Ben Kamen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MS's lack of adherence to the protocol.
To bring this closer to Mimedefang, let's look at MS's adherence to
the smtp protocol.
Outlook, under some circumstance, understands a 550 permanent error to
mean try again forever. At the present time we have a
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 07:27:31AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
Users actually need to _do_ something to switch to imap, and rethink
Not only that, if a large ISP switches from POP3 to IMAP, they'll suddenly
have to buy terabytes of storage...
Hmm... so how did you know that I got the bill
Kenneth Porter wrote:
Why support a free protocol with a quality implementation when you can
*sell* them your proprietary alternative?! (Ie. Exchange.)
The IMAP mail list has eluded to the same thing.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other
10 matches
Mail list logo
