Re: [Mimedefang] Interesting return code from TrendMicro

2004-04-08 Thread Stephen Smoogen
I wrote a silly program to see what was happening.. and it doesnt seem to be default perl (perse) !/usr/bin/perl # # this is a silly test of vscan # open(SCANNER, "/etc/iscan/vscan -za -a /tmp/eicar* 2>&1|"); while () { $msg .= $_ } close(SCANNER); print $? . "\n"; print $msg . "\n"; [EMAIL PR

Re: [Mimedefang] Interesting return code from TrendMicro

2004-04-07 Thread David F. Skoll
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > Ok the two issues is that for some reason the $retcode needs to be > divided by 512 on Red Hat Enterprise 3 (perl 5.8 etc) That is extremely unlikely, unless Red Hat has made major, incompatible changes to the kernel and glibc. The return code from Pe

Re: [Mimedefang] Interesting return code from TrendMicro

2004-04-07 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 17:52, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# rpm -q viruswall > viruswall-3.8-7.LANL_rhel.3 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# rpm -q mimedefang > mimedefang-2.41-1.LANL_rhel.3 > > For some reason, this combination worked with 2.35/2.39 without any > problems. However, now

[Mimedefang] Interesting return code from TrendMicro

2004-04-06 Thread Stephen Smoogen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# rpm -q viruswall viruswall-3.8-7.LANL_rhel.3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# rpm -q mimedefang mimedefang-2.41-1.LANL_rhel.3 For some reason, this combination worked with 2.35/2.39 without any problems. However, now I keep getting tempfail actions in the interpret_trend_code subro