since the leak, I've definitely seen an immediate uptick in fishing to my email
address.
Well...
Maybe not.
;)
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
-Ben
--
Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P.
--
eMail:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:41:53 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my logs from before
the breach was disclosed...
On 2012-06-07 1:05 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:41:53 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 12:41:53 -0500
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my logs
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012 21:40:41 +0200 (CEST)
Kees Theunissen c.j.theunis...@differ.nl wrote:
Just wondering: didn't you mix up some addresses?
No.
You wrote that the locked addresses were bound to a particular
sending domain. So if this is your linkedin address I would expect a
plain reject
David F. Skoll scribbled:
Ben Kamen bka...@benjammin.net wrote:
Has anyone else seen an increase since the breach?
Not really. But interestingly, I've seen a few emails to my theoretically
secret former LinkedIn address. These are in my logs from before
the breach was disclosed...
6 matches
Mail list logo
