Re: [Mimedefang] MD and ClamAV

2010-08-02 Thread Gary Funck
On 07/22/10 12:06:36, Mi??u Moldovan wrote: [...] In fact, I have given up on using an AV on the MX servers altogether, just ban the dangerous file extensions like com, exe, pif, lnk etc. and you are good to go. [...] CLAMAV is also useful for spam filtering. We use the SANE Security

Re: [Mimedefang] MD and ClamAV

2010-07-22 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Jon Rowlan wrote: What would be the preferred and recommended way to use ClamAV with MD? None, I guess, because it all depends on your situation. They both need to use or have access to a .sock Not only that, they need to

Re: [Mimedefang] MD and ClamAV

2010-07-22 Thread Jon Rowlan
What would be the preferred and recommended way to use ClamAV with MD? None, I guess, because it all depends on your situation. They both need to use or have access to a .sock Not only that, they need to have access to the same files to scan, namely the spool directory of Mimedefang, where

Re: [Mimedefang] MD and ClamAV

2010-07-22 Thread Mișu Moldovan
Jon Rowlan jon.row...@sads.com a scris: What would be the preferred and recommended way to use ClamAV with MD? They both need to use or have access to a .sock So should I run Clam as defang or change perms so that both Clam and MD can talk to the same directory or indeed move the location

[Mimedefang] MD and ClamAV

2010-07-21 Thread Jon Rowlan
What would be the preferred and recommended way to use ClamAV with MD? They both need to use or have access to a .sock So should I run Clam as defang or change perms so that both Clam and MD can talk to the same directory or indeed move the location of the Clam AV .sock? I would really like to

[Mimedefang] MD 2.51/clamav .88.1 failure

2006-04-10 Thread Richard J. Kieran
On Friday, 4/7, I updated clamav from version .88 to .88.1. When I did so, virus scanning broke. Maillog was filled with entries like: Apr 7 15:49:23 hoover mimedefang.pl[66764]: Problem running virus scanner: code=999, category=cannot-execute, action=tempfail Apr 7 15:49:23 hoover

Re: [Mimedefang] MD 2.51/clamav .88.1 failure

2006-04-10 Thread Ron Wilhoite
On 4/10/2006 11:01 AM, Richard J. Kieran wrote: On Friday, 4/7, I updated clamav from version .88 to .88.1. When I did so, virus scanning broke. Maillog was filled with entries like: Apr 7 15:49:23 hoover mimedefang.pl[66764]: Problem running virus scanner: code=999, category=cannot-execute,

Re: [Mimedefang] MD 2.51/clamav .88.1 failure

2006-04-10 Thread David F. Skoll
Ron Wilhoite wrote: FWIW, I portupgraded clamav to 0.88.1 and it's running fine with MD 2.56 on FreeBSD 6.0 after restarting MD. We have probably 100 customers on MD 2.56 and ClamAV 0.88.1 running without problems. Perhaps the OP needs to upgrade MIMEDefang. Regards, David.

Re: [Mimedefang] MD 2.51/clamav .88.1 failure

2006-04-10 Thread Alan Premselaar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard J. Kieran wrote: On Friday, 4/7, I updated clamav from version .88 to .88.1. When I did so, virus scanning broke. Maillog was filled with entries like: Apr 7 15:49:23 hoover mimedefang.pl[66764]: Problem running virus scanner: code=999,