On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
> Might spamc/spamd gains from the fact that spamd pre-loads more things and
> caches certain internal stuff, which is shared among multiple spamd
> slaves, instead of kept into each MIMEDefang slave?
Unlikely. I think the real speedup comes if there ar
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total
message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part.
Yes, but I fail to see how spamd helps -- it still must, ultimately,
cal
Replying to myself.
> If I look at spamds version of preload_modules_with_tmp_homedir() is is really
> bigger than just spam_assassin_init(). This may explain some delay.
There seem to be only path and tmp handling in preload_modules_with_tmp_homedir.
And spamd calls spam_assassin_init(0,1) and
Hi,
> > On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total
> > message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part.
Hmm,
If I look at spamds version of preload_modules_with_tmp_homedir() is is really
bigger than just spam_assassin_init(). This may explain
--On Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:39 PM -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you configure MIMEDefang to use spamc?
There's no API in MD for it. You have to modify your custom filter to do it.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
> On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total
> message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part.
???
But spamd is written in pure Perl -- there's not an ounce of C there.
So you're saying that invoking sp
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
> On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total
> message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part.
Yes, but I fail to see how spamd helps -- it still must, ultimately,
call into the exact same Perl API as any
ram used.
- Original Message -
From: "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd
>
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
>
> > 1) The compi
David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
>
>> 1) The compiled C spamd processes messages faster then the perl
>> module.
>
> I can't believe that. The message processing is still done in Perl,
> after all.
>
There are other reasons to run spamc/spamd besides C... for e
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
> 1) The compiled C spamd processes messages faster then the perl module.
I can't believe that. The message processing is still done in Perl,
after all.
> 2) We run DCC via dccifd before SA and don't bother running SA if DCC has
> the message listed.
Tha
John Scully wrote:
> I found a very large performance increase by using
> spamc/spamd over the
> Mail::SpamAssassin module for several reasons:
How do you configure MIMEDefang to use spamc?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com S
uses less then 100M memory.
John Scully
iSupportISP.com
- Original Message -
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
&
edefang.pl.
2) How can I verify that mimedefang is scanning files with bad extensions?
Thank you, peter
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:59:07 -0700
Subject: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd
> What's the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the conventional wisdom with using MIMDefang and SpamAssassin?
> Can MIMEDefang invoke spamc to communicate with spamd? Is this better
> than calling the Mail::SpamAssassin perl module directly?
No, and no.
Since MD is already in Perl, invoking spamc and calling spa
What's the conventional wisdom with using MIMDefang and SpamAssassin? Can MIMEDefang
invoke spamc to communicate with spamd? Is this better than calling the
Mail::SpamAssassin perl module directly?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.co
15 matches
Mail list logo
