Re: [Mimedefang] Mimedefang with spamc/spamd

2004-01-28 Thread Lucas Albers
Kelson Vibber said: > At 09:19 AM 1/28/2004, Steve Moore wrote: >>Is it possible to have mimedefang use spamc/spamd rather than loading >>spamassassin? And if so what changes do I make to mimedefang-filter to >>accomplish this? > > MIMEDefang calls SpamAssassin's perl routines directly. It doesn'

Re: [Mimedefang] Mimedefang with spamc/spamd

2004-01-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Because mimedefang runs it's multiplexor/child processes and pre-loads SpamAssassin, you would have no benefits by using spamc/spamd. MD is already mimicking the purpose for those programs to the best of my knowledge. Regards, KAM > I am a mimedefang and spamassassin newbie. I have the both pro

Re: [Mimedefang] Mimedefang with spamc/spamd

2004-01-28 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 09:19 AM 1/28/2004, Steve Moore wrote: Is it possible to have mimedefang use spamc/spamd rather than loading spamassassin? And if so what changes do I make to mimedefang-filter to accomplish this? MIMEDefang calls SpamAssassin's perl routines directly. It doesn't actually load SpamAssassin,

[Mimedefang] Mimedefang with spamc/spamd

2004-01-28 Thread Steve Moore
I am a mimedefang and spamassassin newbie. I have the both products installed and functioning on an AIX 5.1 server with commercial Sendmail. So pardon my question if it has been asked a million times before. Of course I am interested in the best performance I can get. Is it possible to have