Kelson Vibber said:
> At 09:19 AM 1/28/2004, Steve Moore wrote:
>>Is it possible to have mimedefang use spamc/spamd rather than loading
>>spamassassin? And if so what changes do I make to mimedefang-filter to
>>accomplish this?
>
> MIMEDefang calls SpamAssassin's perl routines directly. It doesn'
Because mimedefang runs it's multiplexor/child processes and pre-loads
SpamAssassin, you would have no benefits by using spamc/spamd. MD is
already mimicking the purpose for those programs to the best of my
knowledge.
Regards,
KAM
> I am a mimedefang and spamassassin newbie. I have the both pro
At 09:19 AM 1/28/2004, Steve Moore wrote:
Is it possible to have mimedefang use spamc/spamd rather than loading
spamassassin? And if so what changes do I make to mimedefang-filter to
accomplish this?
MIMEDefang calls SpamAssassin's perl routines directly. It doesn't
actually load SpamAssassin,
I am a mimedefang and spamassassin newbie. I have the both products
installed and functioning on an AIX 5.1 server with commercial
Sendmail. So pardon my question if it has been asked a million times
before. Of course I am interested in the best performance I can get. Is
it possible to have
4 matches
Mail list logo