they did release one code snippet which was quickly digested by the
industry's experts who resolved it was not infringing... at that point,
the suit became much more of a joke as most people said, ~ if that's the
bext they've got.. and so forth...
-Ben
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Kevin A.
Hi, All.
Let's take the SCO thread offline, please.
Thanks,
David.
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
--On Friday, July 09, 2004 11:28 AM -0400 David F. Skoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's take the SCO thread offline, please.
To assist in that, I figured I'd look for a suitable mailing list:
http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8safe=offq=sco+linux+mailmanbtnG=Search
And this one
SCO has not, to my knowledge, openly released the basis for their claims
that Linux (specifically the 2.4 kernel and above) contains code that is
owned by the SCO Group. The general information is that it involves some
SMP code that IBM allegedly leaked after they had access to the SCO Source
4 matches
Mail list logo