Re: [Mimedefang] OT: SCO

2004-07-09 Thread Ben Kamen
they did release one code snippet which was quickly digested by the industry's experts who resolved it was not infringing... at that point, the suit became much more of a joke as most people said, ~ if that's the bext they've got.. and so forth... -Ben On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Kevin A.

ADMINISTRIVIA: Off-topic thread (was Re: [Mimedefang] OT: SCO)

2004-07-09 Thread David F. Skoll
Hi, All. Let's take the SCO thread offline, please. Thanks, David. ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang

Re: ADMINISTRIVIA: Off-topic thread (was Re: [Mimedefang] OT: SCO)

2004-07-09 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, July 09, 2004 11:28 AM -0400 David F. Skoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's take the SCO thread offline, please. To assist in that, I figured I'd look for a suitable mailing list: http://www.google.com/search?num=100hl=enlr=ie=UTF-8safe=offq=sco+linux+mailmanbtnG=Search And this one

[Mimedefang] OT: SCO

2004-07-08 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
SCO has not, to my knowledge, openly released the basis for their claims that Linux (specifically the 2.4 kernel and above) contains code that is owned by the SCO Group. The general information is that it involves some SMP code that IBM allegedly leaked after they had access to the SCO Source