kd6...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any spammer stupid enough to try to send his spew forging this host
name as the sender address will also face an SPF-RR v=spf1 -all
(while those idiots still resolving ONLY TXT-RRs for SPF will get
v=spf1 +all).
Some ahem idiots are still using DNS infrastructure that
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Kris Deugau kdeu...@vianet.ca wrote:
kd6...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any spammer stupid enough to try to send his spew forging this host
name as the sender address will also face an SPF-RR v=spf1 -all
(while those idiots still resolving ONLY TXT-RRs for SPF will get
On 11/18/2011 10:36 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
kd6...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any spammer stupid enough to try to send his spew forging this host
name as the sender address will also face an SPF-RR v=spf1 -all
(while those idiots still resolving ONLY TXT-RRs for SPF will get
v=spf1 +all).
Some ahem
Hello folks,
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only MX
record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this type
of setup for legitimate e-mail?
For example:
# nslookup
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only MX
record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this type
of setup for legitimate e-mail?
Our commercial product has a setting to reject
On 2011-11-17 3:05 PM, d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only MX
record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this type
of setup for legitimate
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's domain from
within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a sender's one and only
MX record is a fake MX tempfailing service? Has anyone ever seen this
type of setup for legitimate e-mail?
For example:
# nslookup -type=MX babe.org
--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Mike Grau m.g...@kcc.state.ks.us wrote:
Those people checking for valid MX records for a sender's
domain from within MIMEdefang ... is anybody checking if a
sender's one and only MX record is a fake MX tempfailing
service? Has anyone ever seen this type of setup for
8 matches
Mail list logo