Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:17:34PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote: One idea would be to make some very small part of MIMEDefang into a CPAN module, and let that module's build script automatically get the truly required Perl modules. Yes, that's a good idea. But if we did that, I would

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-04-12 Thread Jeff Rife
On 13 Jan 2006 at 19:28, David F. Skoll wrote: One of the biggest complaints from people who've tried MIMEDefang is the number of Perl modules it requires. I really hesitate to make another absolute dependency; I'd rather continue to use the mechanism in

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-04-12 Thread David F. Skoll
Jeff Rife wrote: One idea would be to make some very small part of MIMEDefang into a CPAN module, and let that module's build script automatically get the truly required Perl modules. Yes, that's a good idea. But if we did that, I would throw out most of the existing code and rewrite

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-14 Thread nathan r. hruby
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, David F. Skoll wrote: [snip] is probably not in the cards. One of the biggest complaints from people who've tried MIMEDefang is the number of Perl modules it requires. [snip] These people have obviously never installed RT :) MIMEDefangs' pre-requisites are perfectly

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-14 Thread David F. Skoll
Philip Prindeville wrote: I suppose for people using RPM's with yum or smart, it might be different. The best way to handle that is to package the different filters in their own RPMs, and then *those* RPMs can specify the correct dependencies. So you know that if you want to use

Perl dependencies (was Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...)

2006-01-14 Thread David F. Skoll
nathan r. hruby wrote: These people have obviously never installed RT :) Heh! We use RT here. Actually, if you really want to discover some dependency hell, try Catalyst plus Template Toolkit. Catalyst is a wonderful MVC-based Web development suite---gorgeous to use, but an absolute bear to

[Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
I'd like to propose the following patch, as a prequel to the posting of an amended mimedefang-filter on the Wiki... --- redhat/mimedefang-spec.in.bak 2004-09-21 19:50:36.0 -0600 +++ redhat/mimedefang-spec.in 2006-01-13 15:51:55.0 -0700 @@ -138,16 +138,17 @@ Release:

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Richard Laager
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:54 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: I'd like to propose the following patch, as a prequel to the posting of an amended mimedefang-filter on the Wiki... If your changes are only going on the Wiki, then adding a Requires to the mimedefang package is incorrect. Richard

RE: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Damrose, Mark
If your filter example post to the Wiki requires Net-CIDR-Lite, state that in your Wiki entry. Those who want to use your code can load the module. IMHO, the spec file, should only require packages that are truly required by MIMEDefang, not packages that are popular extras in local filters.

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
Richard Laager wrote: On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:54 -0700, Philip Prindeville wrote: I'd like to propose the following patch, as a prequel to the posting of an amended mimedefang-filter on the Wiki... If your changes are only going on the Wiki, then adding a Requires to the mimedefang

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread David F. Skoll
Philip Prindeville wrote: I'm hoping that the .spec changes will mesh with the support for filter_helo and the basic scripting for it that will be in the future release that includes it. filter_helo is one thing, but adding a dependency on Net::CIDR::Lite is probably not in the cards. One of

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
Well, the question then becomes is should the shipped .spec file support all of the example config files and scripts as well? -Philip Damrose, Mark wrote: If your filter example post to the Wiki requires Net-CIDR-Lite, state that in your Wiki entry. Those who want to use your code can load

RE: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Philip wrote: Well, the question then becomes is should the shipped .spec file support all of the example config files and scripts as well? I think of the example config files and scripts as serving suggestions whose caloric content is not included in the nutrition facts. ;) --

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
No. MD is a framework and an Opensource one at that. People looking for a cookie cutter approach who don't know perl should by CanIt. Well, the question then becomes is should the shipped .spec file support all of the example config files and scripts as well?

Re: [Mimedefang] Patch to mimedefang...

2006-01-13 Thread Philip Prindeville
David F. Skoll wrote: filter_helo is one thing, but adding a dependency on Net::CIDR::Lite is probably not in the cards. One of the biggest complaints from people who've tried MIMEDefang is the number of Perl modules it requires. I really hesitate to make another absolute dependency; I'd

[Mimedefang] Patch against MIMEDefang 2.49 to support Hauri antivirus

2004-12-02 Thread Cristian Othon Martinez Vera
. This patch adds support for MIMEDefang 2.49 to use 'virobot' to filter virus. It modifies two files: configure.in, which adds the '--disable-hauri' option to configure; and mimedefang.pl.in, including three routines: entity_contains_virus_hauri(), message_contains_virus_hauri