Matthew van Eerde wrote:
> unshift (@msg, @sahdrs);
Hmm... I think I need to add a comment here...
# Note the new headers end up *before* the pre-existing headers.
# This is important for thinks like DomainKeys.
unshift (@msg, @sahdrs);
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hb
Richard Laager wrote:
> Use the embedded Perl feature of MIMEDefang and use compile_now() from
> SpamAssassin. That way, the SpamAssassin initialization is done once.
> fork() on Linux (and Unix in general, I believe) is very lightweight.
> The SpamAssassin stuff in memory will be shared by all th
John Nemeth wrote:
> Why don't you create a function to call spamd directly, similar
> to the way that MIMEDefang calls clamd? That way, you won't have the
> spamc process overhead?
Something like
use Mail::SpamAssassin::Client;
my $c = new Mail::SpamAssassin::Client(...);
my $report = $c-
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 11:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do all sorts of things w/ MIMEDefang besides spam-scan,
> and while the MIMEDefang threads are doing all these things,
> that SpamAssassin module is sitting there idle, but taking
> up space.
Use the embedded Perl feature of MIMEDefan
On Mar 17, 5:37am, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
}
} I've broken down and coded a mimedefang-filter that calls spamc
} instead of use'ing Mail::SpamAssassin.
}
} I'd ideally like to post this on the wiki for those who might find it
} useful... but I'm interested in feedback first. Can you glance ove
I've broken down and coded a mimedefang-filter that calls spamc instead of
use'ing Mail::SpamAssassin.
I'd ideally like to post this on the wiki for those who might find it useful...
but I'm interested in feedback first. Can you glance over the code and tell me
what you think?
The idea is to t
6 matches
Mail list logo
