On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:43:37PM +0900, Mark van Proctor wrote:
Has anyone implemented some form of parsing of the received headers to
determine who the previous relay was? When is the earliest time that these
headers are available? filter_begin?
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:43:37PM +0900, Mark van Proctor wrote:
Has anyone implemented some form of parsing of the received headers to
determine who the previous relay was? When is the earliest time that these
headers are available? filter_begin? Are these easily accessible through
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 01:44:01PM -0500, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Has anyone implemented some form of parsing of the received headers to
determine who the previous relay was? When is the earliest time that these
headers are available? filter_begin? Are these easily accessible through
-Original Message-
From: Whit Blauvelt
Alternately you could use $RelayAddr to recognize what's come
in by the secondary MX and segregate it somehow - assuming
that that system's not also sending you stuff as a normal
relay from the ISP or whatever - and then only go through
Hi all,
After a fair bit of effort I have managed to implement graylisting /
whitelisting using mimedefang (with sqlite) - it works fantastically so I'm
very proud. *blush*
A couple of spam, however, are getting through by sending to our secondary
mail server, which we have no control over and
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:43:37PM +0900, Mark van Proctor wrote:
A couple of spam, however, are getting through by sending to our secondary
mail server, which we have no control over and which is then forwarding the
emails to us (in an smtp compliant manner... respecting out TEMPFAILs and
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:43:37PM +0900, Mark van Proctor wrote:
A couple of spam, however, are getting through by sending to our secondary
mail server, which we have no control over and which is then forwarding the
emails to us (in an smtp compliant manner... respecting out TEMPFAILs and
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 06:43:37PM +0900, Mark van Proctor wrote:
Any help / thoughts / suggestions are much appreciated!!
One thing I did do, which might not apply to you, but since you said Any
...
A great deal of the spam to my system is to addresses that have apparently
been harvested from
8 matches
Mail list logo
