On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 03:18:11PM +0200, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
Also: I have a patch against MIME::Parser to support a max_depth
limit
I promised to get back on this. The patch is now available at:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~johnpc/MIME-tools-5.420-maxdepth.patch
This includes a test to test for
But I'm just speculating here: handwaving, educated guesses, some
astrology, and reading the intestines of a freshly slaughtered goat,
which is the first thing to consult in case of sendmail troubles
anyway.
You just reminded me of a quote...
It's not black magic, but there are legitimate
I briefly studied that code, and it doesn't really help because this
code can already return SMFIS_REJECT at xxfi_body() time. Mimedefang
doesn't allow interactivity with sendmail at that level.
However, if you then look at the milter_data() routine in milter.c from
the sendmail source, then
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/15/2006 08:35:56
AM:
You just reminded me of a quote...
It's not black magic, but there are legitimate technical reasons why
sendmail configuration requires the sacrificing of a live chicken.
-unknown-
I have the same quote posted prominantly on my wall...
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:35:56AM -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
But I'm just speculating here: handwaving, educated guesses, some
astrology, and reading the intestines of a freshly slaughtered goat,
which is the first thing to consult in case of sendmail troubles
anyway.
You just reminded
Group,
Sendmail.org has released sendmail 8.13.7. I see nothing in there that
should/would cause any issues for MIMEDefang, except for one overlapping
feature between the two packages. The sample mimedefang-filter.example sets
$MaxMIMEParts = 50, where if I'm reading the sendmail release notes
Cormack, Ken wrote:
[...]
David, would this opaque remaining content present a problem for
MIMEDefang?
I'm not sure. I'd have to study the Sendmail source code to see if
MIMEDefang gets the original, raw body, or the body after Sendmail
has done 8-7 conversion.
Regards,
David.
David, would this opaque remaining content present a problem for
MIMEDefang?
I'm not sure. I'd have to study the Sendmail source code to see if
MIMEDefang gets the original, raw body, or the body after Sendmail
has done 8-7 conversion.
The release notes read like this compile-time
I'm not sure. I'd have to study the Sendmail source code to see if
MIMEDefang gets the original, raw body, or the body after Sendmail
has done 8-7 conversion.
If it's faster to get the answer from a smaller piece of code, sendmail has
posted a small milter of their own
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 02:51:33PM -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
Sendmail.org has released sendmail 8.13.7. I see nothing in there that
should/would cause any issues for MIMEDefang, except for one overlapping
feature between the two packages. The sample mimedefang-filter.example sets
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 04:41:30PM -0400, Cormack, Ken wrote:
If it's faster to get the answer from a smaller piece of code, sendmail has
posted a small milter of their own
(ftp://ftp.sendmail.org/pub/sendmail/nesting-filter-1.0.0.tar.gz), to screen
out emails with deeply-nested parts. Would
11 matches
Mail list logo
