I don't use either feature.
On 04/27/2016 02:20 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
I most likely won't delete the features. It's the curse of software
development... published APIs must live forever. :(
If killing the features is the right move, just call it MIMEDefang 3.
Seriously! Don't be afraid of
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:17:03 +0200
"Andrzej A. Filip" wrote:
> With or without sendmail's "excessive" schemes of lookups?
I don't know; I guess the bottom line was that I was insufficiently
motivated to look into this, so I just dropped it.
> IMHO I may make sense to
Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:54:43 +0200
> "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote:
>
>> If your ambition is hardly limited then you may donate sendmail.org
>> "socketmap alike over UDP". It could be simple assuming design for
>> unix sockets.
>
Dianne Skoll wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:41:57 +0100
> Dave Osbourne wrote:
>
> [Dianne]
>> > 2) Does anyone use the "-N map_sock" feature that provides a
>> > SOCKETMAP to Sendmail 8.13+? If not... again, I'd like to nuke.
>
> [Dave]
>> I
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:54:43 +0200
"Andrzej A. Filip" wrote:
> If your ambition is hardly limited then you may donate sendmail.org
> "socketmap alike over UDP". It could be simple assuming design for
> unix sockets.
In our tests, the overhead wasn't the socket
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:41:57 +0100
Dave Osbourne wrote:
[Dianne]
> > 2) Does anyone use the "-N map_sock" feature that provides a
> > SOCKETMAP to Sendmail 8.13+? If not... again, I'd like to nuke.
[Dave]
> I don't really know what this is... have a exposed my
6 matches
Mail list logo