Re: [Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Richard Laager
I don't use either feature. On 04/27/2016 02:20 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote: I most likely won't delete the features. It's the curse of software development... published APIs must live forever. :( If killing the features is the right move, just call it MIMEDefang 3. Seriously! Don't be afraid of

Re: [Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 21:17:03 +0200 "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > With or without sendmail's "excessive" schemes of lookups? I don't know; I guess the bottom line was that I was insufficiently motivated to look into this, so I just dropped it. > IMHO I may make sense to

Re: [Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:54:43 +0200 > "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > >> If your ambition is hardly limited then you may donate sendmail.org >> "socketmap alike over UDP". It could be simple assuming design for >> unix sockets. >

Re: [Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Andrzej A. Filip
Dianne Skoll wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:41:57 +0100 > Dave Osbourne wrote: > > [Dianne] >> > 2) Does anyone use the "-N map_sock" feature that provides a >> > SOCKETMAP to Sendmail 8.13+? If not... again, I'd like to nuke. > > [Dave] >> I

Re: [Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 20:54:43 +0200 "Andrzej A. Filip" wrote: > If your ambition is hardly limited then you may donate sendmail.org > "socketmap alike over UDP". It could be simple assuming design for > unix sockets. In our tests, the overhead wasn't the socket

[Mimedefang] Sendmail SOCKETMAP

2016-04-27 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:41:57 +0100 Dave Osbourne wrote: [Dianne] > > 2) Does anyone use the "-N map_sock" feature that provides a > > SOCKETMAP to Sendmail 8.13+? If not... again, I'd like to nuke. [Dave] > I don't really know what this is... have a exposed my