On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:27:37 -0400 "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
> I consider .local to be officially grandfathered as an internal-use > TLD akin to non routing IPv4 space like 192.168.X and 10.X albeit not > as based in standards. This is interesting reading: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local "Despite not being a valid top-level domain in the Internet, considerable DNS traffic that queries the local domain exists in the public Domain Name System. In June 2009, the L root server received more than 400 such queries per second,[2] ranking 4th in DNS traffic of all TLDs after COM, ARPA, and NET." RFC 1918 addresses don't typically leak out onto the Internet, so they don't cause much damage outside an organization. .local clearly does. Regards, David. _______________________________________________ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore it. Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
