Alan,
Thank you,
Being relatively new to Perl and completely new to MimeDefang, any example
helps me understand both. All of my threads, so far, seem to turn in to very
long lengths, but the various opinions and ideas make me consider the many
ways, right or wrong, to do the same thing.
I
I have just finished testing MimeDefang on a test gateway. All worked fine
there. I apologize for making this task so bothersome on this list, but I
now find that in production, it does do what I need. The following scenario
exists.
I have two mailservers. Each server is the mailstore for a
Gary,
Thanks very much.
- Original Message -
From: Gary McLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mimedefang mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] What is the order of things that occur
Can someone verify for me that sendmail checks
- Original Message -
From: Steve Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I found two problems I had with my set up here.
Correction:
One - I uncommented the MX_RECIPIENT_CHECKS in sysconfig but did change
it from no to yes
One - I uncommented the MX_RECIPIENT_CHECKS in sysconfig but did NOT
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:01:39PM -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
I have two mailservers. Each server is the mailstore for a different
domain. Each non-mailstore is a secondary MX for the other server's domain.
Each secondary relays mail for the other server's domain using the
mailertable.
Jan-Pieter,
- Original Message -
From: Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] What is the order of things that occur
Three things:
1) did you enable the filter_recipient call, by
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 04:00:05PM -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
In the current internet, there isn't any point in having a secondary
MX just for the purpose of fallback, if your primary server is mostly
up.
My boss is afraid of losing the secondaries. He feels that if these
tempfail due to
Jan-Pieter,
Thanks and wow!
Quoting Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 04:00:05PM -0400, Steve Campbell wrote:
In the current internet, there isn't any point in having a secondary
MX just for the purpose of fallback, if your primary server is mostly
up.
The
8 matches
Mail list logo