Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-30 Thread Jonas Eckerman
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 18:33:20 -0600, Scott Ladewig wrote: (2) Whoever, as an owner or employee of an enterprise indicated in subsection (1) and without authorization: Key phrase: without authorization If the users have authorized the suppresion of messages containing virii, then it's

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-30 Thread Lucas Albers
Alexander Dalloz said: This law has a more general usage and applies too for instance on central mail services in university area. This is the reason i.e. why the mail admin at my university neglects to filter out viruses/worms by rules which may cause loss of false positives. Alexander

[Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Andrzej Marecki
The spreading infection of MyDoom made me change my filter. The idea is the following: there is absolutely no point in bouncing the infected mails nowadays because contemporary worms - like MyDoom - notoriously forge sender address. Therefore my /etc/mail/mimedefang-filter (starting from line

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
line ~220) looks like this - see below. No bouncing, no quarantines, just action_discard. For ALL the viruses/worms. That's it! Well, in most countries this is however illegal. I think common sense and a lack of case law on this would prevail and would urge all ISP and administrators to

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I doubt it. Do you have evidence to support this statement? I am under the same belief he is. It is my understanding that numerous countries privacy laws can be construed to cover electronic email and intrusions to do A/V and A/S by the ISP. Even storing IPs of users for more than 3-days in

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Lucas Albers
On Thursday 29 January 2004 11:28, Andrzej Marecki wrote: action_discard. For ALL the viruses/worms. That's it! Well, in most countries this is however illegal. Show me a single law that says this is illegal. It's your mail you can do with it what you will, you only need to handle your

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am Do, den 29.01.2004 schrieb David F. Skoll um 15:13: On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Dirk Mueller wrote: line ~220) looks like this - see below. No bouncing, no quarantines, just action_discard. For ALL the viruses/worms. That's it! Well, in most countries this is however illegal. I doubt

Re: [Mimedefang] action_bounce - forget it!

2004-01-29 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am Do, den 29.01.2004 schrieb Lucas Albers um 16:29: On Thursday 29 January 2004 11:28, Andrzej Marecki wrote: action_discard. For ALL the viruses/worms. That's it! Well, in most countries this is however illegal. Show me a single law that says this is illegal. It's your mail you