Sorry, read that as:
I got tired of the disk I/O grind from DB3 & bayes/AWL so I switched to
mySQL which seems much better on using reources efficiently.
KAM
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 09:10:50PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> > [keeping Bayes DB in RAM is] Probably a g
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
[keeping Bayes DB in RAM is] Probably a good move. I got a little
tired of the disk I/O grind with DB and Bayes/AWL and I'm using
mySQL. It seems much better on using the resources of the server
most efficiently.
That's strange. We use our own Bayes implementation in CanI
Probably a good move. I got a little tired of the disk I/O grind with DB
and Bayes/AWL and I'm using mySQL. It seems much better on using the
resources of the server most efficiently.
Regards,
KAM
I keep my bayes database on the ramdisk. My init scripts copy the db to
disk on shutdown, and c
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
NOTE: You'll want to place your bayesian database and auto-whitelist
somewhere else as noted by Bill Curtis!
I keep my bayes database on the ramdisk. My init scripts copy the db to
disk on shutdown, and copy into ramdisk on startup. Sendmail is rest
--On Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:28 PM -0400 "David F. Skoll"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check the FAQ, especially:
http://www.mimedefang.org/kwiki/index.cgi?RamBasedSpoolDirectory
If you've been happy with MIMEDefang and have NOT been using a RAM
disk, you must have a pretty low mail volume.
I'v
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 3:15 PM
Subject: [Mimedefang] using a RAM disk for mimedefang temp directory?
> we've been using mimedefang+spamassassin under sendmail for quite some
> time now, very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> we've been using mimedefang+spamassassin under sendmail for quite some
> time now, very successfully.
>
> looking around for ways to speed things up and/or just make them more
> efficient ... wondering if anyone has experience using a RAM disk
> (tmpfs as opposed to an e
Matthew Ward wrote:
> looking around for ways to speed things up and/or just make them more
> efficient ... wondering if anyone has experience using a RAM disk
> (tmpfs as opposed to an expen$ive solid state disk) for mimedefang's
> temporary directory?
:-)
Check the FAQ, especially:
http://www.
we've been using mimedefang+spamassassin under sendmail for quite some
time now, very successfully.
looking around for ways to speed things up and/or just make them more
efficient ... wondering if anyone has experience using a RAM disk
(tmpfs as opposed to an expen$ive solid state disk) for mimede
9 matches
Mail list logo
