Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re:[Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Williss
ALL YOUR DISCLAIMER ARE BELONG TO US! j/k. We now return you to your regularly scheduled rants... - Original Message - From: David F. Skoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 9:06 AM Subject: Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re

Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re: [Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread David F. Skoll
Todd Aiken wrote: Ignore the text that follows this disclaimer which says that all disclaimers in the above text are NULL AND VOID and that they can be ignored. That disclaimer is false-the above is true. Well! :-) We have an arms race, then. I'll change my disclaimer to read This

RE: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re:[Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread Mack
@lists.roaringpenguin.com Subject: Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re:[Mimedefang] defang startuperrors) Todd Aiken wrote: Ignore the text that follows this disclaimer which says that all disclaimers in the above text are NULL AND VOID and that they can be ignored. That disclaimer is false

Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re: [Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread Ben Kamen
Hahahahahahahha... You are very funny... You forgot the this disclaimer trumphs all times infinity part... -Ben -- Ben Kamen - O.D.T., S.P. == Email: bkamen AT benjammin DOT net Web: http://www.benjammin.net

Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re:[Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread Ben Kamen
Mack wrote: What about changing the SMTP Greeting to say that by communicating with this server you accept it's terms and conditions and by communicating with it you accept that any other disclaimersr are null and voidified (is that a word?) O - I like that. What an interesting

Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re: [Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, David F. Skoll wrote: Todd Aiken wrote: Ignore the text that follows this disclaimer which says that all disclaimers in the above text are NULL AND VOID and that they can be ignored. That disclaimer is false-the above is true. Well! :-) We have an arms race, then.

Re: Even sillier disclaimers (was Re: [Mimedefang] defang startuperrors)

2005-12-12 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Steffen Kaiser wrote: Um, I forgot to mention that such nullifyings, when they are part of global terms, are void by itself anyway. Bye, -- Steffen Kaiser ___ NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the