RE: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-30 Thread Lucas Albers
Les Mikesell said: > On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 05:09, Paul Murphy wrote: My expectation is that at some >> point it >> will stop adding records, but claim to have successfully done so. My greylist implementation does not delete records, does yours? Would that make any differnce, in your opinion? I'

RE: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-30 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 05:09, Paul Murphy wrote: > Running a test script which does nothing but add one record and exit works OK, > even if the script is called several thousand times in a loop, though I have yet > to test it with more than 5000 records. My expectation is that at some point it > w

RE: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-30 Thread Steffen Kaiser
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Paul Murphy wrote: Running a test script which does nothing but add one record and exit works OK, even if the script is called several thousand times in a loop, though I have yet We have some serious problem with BerkleyDB on Debian in conjunction with OpenLDAP's slapd. We hav

RE: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-30 Thread Paul Murphy
Lucas said: > I'm unsure why you are suffering corruption in your db_file. > I have been using db_file greylist for month's with never any > corruption. > I'm using my implementation of greylisting, but that seems irrelevant, as > Jonas's implementation is working fine for him. > Do you have: > an

RE: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-29 Thread Lee Dilkie
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lucas >Albers >Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 5:11 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend > > > >Jeff Grossman said: &

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-29 Thread Lucas Albers
Jeff Grossman said: > [better] alternative to db_file with some of the corruption that has been > mentioned. > If many people are doing fine with db_file, then I might just stay with Well it's used as the native bayesian db format for SA, and their has not been complaints of corruption on the SA m

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-29 Thread Jeff Grossman
on 6/29/04 9:49 AM, Lucas Albers at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jonas Eckerman said: >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:49:34 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: >> >>>   I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people >>>   on this list prefer for their backend database, and why? >> [Jonas sai

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-29 Thread Lucas Albers
Jonas Eckerman said: > On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:49:34 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: > >>  I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people >>  on this list prefer for their backend database, and why? > [Jonas said ] I'm unsure why you are suffering corruption in your db_file. I have b

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-27 Thread Jonas Eckerman
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:49:34 -0700, Jeff Grossman wrote: >  I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people >  on this list prefer for their backend database, and why? I'm using DB_File, and so far I haven't seen any problem with it. Other apps on the same machine are using much

Re: [Mimedefang] Greylisting code, now with mysql Backend

2004-06-25 Thread Jeff Grossman
on 6/25/04 9:59 AM, John Kirkland at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The mysql version of the greylisting backend has been running fine > overnight, so here is the new code: > > http://www.bl.org/~jpk/md-greylist/ I know my next question is pretty open ended, but what do people on this list prefer fo