RE: [Mimedefang] Heads up: Change in behvior for 2.43

2004-05-07 Thread Michael Sims
Cormack, Ken wrote: >> Does this mean that for those of us who reject on invalid EHLO/HELO >> this rejection will now have to take place after the DATA phase, > Michael, about your helo check... > > Where I had the following in filter_relay(): > > #sub filter_relay { > # > # my ($hostip, $host

RE: [Mimedefang] Heads up: Change in behvior for 2.43

2004-05-07 Thread Cormack, Ken
> Does this mean that for those of us who reject on invalid EHLO/HELO this rejection > will now have to take place after the DATA phase, instead of after MAIL? In the > past four days, my relay has rejected 17,463 delivery attempts due to EHLO/HELO > parameters that contain my domain, or are bare I

RE: [Mimedefang] Heads up: Change in behvior for 2.43

2004-05-07 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Michael Sims wrote: > David F. Skoll wrote: > > The next release will call filter_relay immediately after the remote > > machine connects. > Does this mean that for those of us who reject on invalid EHLO/HELO > this rejection will now have to take place after the DATA phase,

RE: [Mimedefang] Heads up: Change in behvior for 2.43

2004-05-07 Thread Michael Sims
David F. Skoll wrote: > Currently, filter_relay is not called until after the MAIL command. > The next release will call filter_relay immediately after the remote > machine connects. [...] > I don't think this will have a huge impact on people; just move any > tests that require $helo and/or a Send