On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/08/2004 09:37:16
AM:
What about a DNS configuration with an invalid private MX as first one?
They are probably lazy and do not have split DNS servers, or seperate ones
for internal vs external resolution. The external ones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/12/2004 08:41:58
AM:
Yeap, it seems to be some problem like that. Their hoster mailed the
reply
to me(???) that this setup was the cheapest one and that it was agreed
among them and me(??). ;)
Lazy is more like it. It's possible to run split DNS with BIND
2 config files - run bind 2 times binding the service to each interface. (that's
the important part - MUST have 2 ethernet interfaces)
Also - MS DNS is very evil. VERY evil. I would highly advise against running it.
-Ben
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lazy is more like it. It's possible to run split
-Original Message-
From: Ben Kamen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2 config files - run bind 2 times binding the service to each
interface. (that's
the important part - MUST have 2 ethernet interfaces)
No. BIND 9 can run multiple configurations on one interface and
with one daemon.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/08/2004 09:37:16
AM:
What about a DNS configuration with an invalid private MX as first one?
They are probably lazy and do not have split DNS servers, or seperate ones
for internal vs external resolution. The external ones are filters, and
the one with the
5 matches
Mail list logo