Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:31:50 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] ZDnet article on new Zombie Trick
Why would the ISP do this? To protect themselves from being sued by the
spam recipients' ISPs.
The Laws in the State of IL include exemptions of liability to the ISP
: [Mimedefang] ZDnet article on new Zombie Trick
Why would the ISP do this? To protect themselves from being sued by the
spam recipients' ISPs.
The Laws in the State of IL include exemptions of liability to the
ISP that transfers the email and places the liability of SPAM on the
original
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/04/2005 11:08:55
AM:
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:31:50 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] ZDnet article on new Zombie Trick
Why would the ISP do this? To protect themselves from being sued by
the
spam recipients' ISPs.
The Laws
I thought the definition of ISP was somewhat flexible in the definition as a
remedy for people who do service their own email and such... (i.e. I
hold/service email for more than 1 domain. I think the language could be
interpreted in such a way that it would make me an ISP because of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/04/2005 03:49:08
PM:
I thought the definition of ISP was somewhat flexible in the definition
as a
remedy for people who do service their own email and such... (i.e. I
hold/service email for more than 1 domain. I think the language could be
interpreted in
Actually, read it, any business or individual with a mail server basically is
entitled to file proceedings under the canned spam act. If you have your own
OC3 and mail server(s) then you certainly are eligable. And, as I mentioned
before.. the canned spam act supercedes ANY state laws. VA and
I would think ISP's would want a greylisting filter on their inbound-outbound
ports...
But with my recent experience with my local ISP (SBC) proves to me (since I
directly asked the half a dozen or so SBC tech rep's on the line if anyone
knew anything about TCP/IP - no from all) I doubt if
Ben wrote:
I would think ISP's would want a greylisting filter on their
inbound-outbound ports...
If the spam is coming from their legitimate customers, and is indistinguishable
from normal mail, this will add nothing and annoy their customers, especially
when those using Outlook Express
Paul Murphy wrote:
Ben wrote:
I would think ISP's would want a greylisting filter on their
inbound-outbound ports...
If the spam is coming from their legitimate customers, and is indistinguishable
from normal mail, this will add nothing and annoy their customers, especially
when those using
9 matches
Mail list logo
