On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, David F. Skoll wrote:
The sendmail package of Debian is a bit odd, I agree, but an upgrade
within the various sarge/testing variants never broke my installation,
except that sendmailconfig insists of putting procmail into
/etc/mail/smrsh. However, what would be the way to
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
However, what would be the way to intelligently
handle sendmail's .m4 conf script, without to disable lots of
functionality?
I'm not expert in this sort of thing, but I would have expected for the package
to
provide a sane default sendmail.mc and submit.mc, along with a
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, David F. Skoll wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. Debian package maintainers seem to delight in Doing
Things Differently for a lot of packages, but maybe that's just my
background learning all of the RedHat-isms first. g
Tell me about it! Two of the
Gordon Henderson wrote:
So what I do and just use Debian as a bootstrap mechanism - put sendmail
on hold once it's installed, then just compile up a standard sendmail,
mimedefang, SA, *sql, apache, php, etc. rather than use the packages.
Well, we sell Debian-based e-mail filtering appliances,
David F. Skoll wrote:
Kris Deugau wrote:
Maybe, maybe not. Debian package maintainers seem to delight in
Doing Things Differently for a lot of packages, but maybe that's
just my background learning all of the RedHat-isms first. g
Tell me about it! Two of the pieces of software we rely on
5 matches
Mail list logo
