Re: [Mimedefang] action_tempfail and delete_recipient question

2004-02-04 Thread Kelson Vibber
At 05:43 PM 2/3/2004, Xiaoyan Ma wrote: How can I only tempfail 2 of 5 recipients then? Unless I'm mistaken, you don't tempfail a recipient so much as you tempfail a message. (If anyone can correct me, please do!) Is stream_by_recipient the right approach No, stream_by_recipient won't do what

Re: [Mimedefang] action_tempfail and delete_recipient question

2004-02-04 Thread Jim McCullars
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Kelson Vibber wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, you don't tempfail a recipient so much as you tempfail a message. (If anyone can correct me, please do!) I've seen it happen using md_check_against_smtp_server in filter_recipient(). If the downstream SMTP server is down or

Re: [Mimedefang] action_tempfail and delete_recipient question

2004-02-03 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
Thanks for Kelson's help but I still have a few questions: At 04:22 PM 2/2/2004 -0800, you wrote: At 03:52 PM 2/2/2004, Xiaoyan Ma wrote: 1. Does action_tempfail affects all recipients? Yes. How can I only tempfail 2 of 5 recipients then? Is stream_by_recipient the right approach or I can hold

RE: [Mimedefang] action_tempfail and delete_recipient question

2004-02-03 Thread Xiaoyan Ma
Mathew: Thank you for your reply. The reason I want to move it to filter_begin is that some MTAs don't handle tempfail at RCPT TO stage correctly. They bounce the message instead of requeue. A few people on the list had shared their experience and I have run into the same situation as well.