-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
Do you use spamc to connect to spamd or have you re-implemented the
protocol in Perl?
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 09:31:05AM +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Do you use spamc to connect to spamd or have you re-implemented the
protocol in Perl?
I use spamc. It's a pretty small binary. The spamc-spamd protocol
isn't defined, where the spamc interface is properly defined, so I
didn't want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
I was just wondering, because you shell-out one program per scan now. I
was hoping that there is another way to connect to spamd.
Bye,
- --
Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 01:00:54PM +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
I was just wondering, because you shell-out one program per scan now. I
was hoping that there is another way to connect to spamd.
Well, it's only a small C program, and it's likely in cache, not
executed via the shell but
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 05:27:08PM +0100, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
That said, after a little looking around, there's both a libspamc.so
available (without documentation?), and a protocol description in
the SA distribution in spamd/PROTOCOL. So it should be possible to
create a standalone perl
Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:
But, given the fact that we just switched to using spamd instead of
the builtin Mail::SpamAssassin modules, we don't really need support
builtin to mimedefang at the moment either...
Just curious: Why the switch? Do you see better performance?
Regards,
David.
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 10:00:01AM -0500, David F. Skoll wrote:
But, given the fact that we just switched to using spamd instead of
the builtin Mail::SpamAssassin modules, we don't really need support
builtin to mimedefang at the moment either...
Just curious: Why the switch? Do you see
, that
there was no benefit to using spamd...but we sure see one.
- Original Message -
From: Jan-Pieter Cornet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: spamd vs. builtin SA (was Re: [Mimedefang] Patch: adding custom
headers
8 matches
Mail list logo
