Re: mingw_cflags vs optflags

On Fri, 2020-05-22 at 22:25 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > While looking through the mingw rpm macros, I noticed that we currently have > > mingw{32,64}_cflags = -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 > > whereas for native packages we have > > optflags

mingw_cflags vs optflags

Hi While looking through the mingw rpm macros, I noticed that we currently have mingw{32,64}_cflags = -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 whereas for native packages we have optflags = -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SO

Re: Adding %mingw_make_build and %mingw_make_install

Please do! --Greg On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 1:50 PM Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I'm thinking of adding %mingw_make_build and %mingw_make_install as > counterparts to %make_build and %make install, see [1]. > Comments/objections? > > Sandro > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesyst

Adding %mingw_make_build and %mingw_make_install

Hi I'm thinking of adding %mingw_make_build and %mingw_make_install as counterparts to %make_build and %make install, see [1]. Comments/objections? Sandro [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/pull-request/5 ___ mingw mailing list

Package reviews

Hi I've got quite a number of mingw packages I maintain in this COPR repo [1] which I wouldn't mind moving to the main repos, but so far I've shied away from submitting all the review requests not sure if there are people in the mingw group here having the capacity to perform the reviews. Is