Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pdh - 32bit

2010-07-31 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:24 PM, NightStrike wrote: > Hopefully soon.  We (read: I) have to put together a wiki page > describing our release policies and whatnot. -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who u

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 7/31/10 1:13 PM, Kai Tietz wrote: > On x64 you can use here -lwmsvcrt to get this symbol. For 32-bit this > symbol is exported, so you shouldn't have here any troubles. Excellent, it works perfectly. Thank you Kai! Chris

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Luis Lavena wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> >> If that change goes back to 2002, then it was intended for >> really old gcc versions, The oldest I currently use from time to >> time is 3.4.5 and AFAIK it has no problems with nameles

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Luis Lavena
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > If that change goes back to 2002, then it was intended for > really old gcc versions, The oldest I currently use from time to > time is 3.4.5 and AFAIK it has no problems with nameless > unions and structs. And surely the current 4.4.x and ne

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Luis Lavena wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> >>> We might need a DUMMY* name audit for DUMMYUNIONNAME, however I do >>> wonder why you actually _need_ DUMMYUNIONNAME and use those union/struct >>> members with dummy names in the fir

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Luis Lavena
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> >> We might need a DUMMY* name audit for DUMMYUNIONNAME, however I do >> wonder why you actually _need_ DUMMYUNIONNAME and use those union/struct >> members with dummy names in the first place? > > Sorry, I really meant "why you actually _need

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've installed i686-w64-mingw32 for darwin target (20100730), and I'm >> trying to cross-compile a Ruby extension that uses oleauto (it is >> bundled with Ruby sources and is

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Luis Lavena wrote: > Hello, > > I've installed i686-w64-mingw32 for darwin target (20100730), and I'm > trying to cross-compile a Ruby extension that uses oleauto (it is > bundled with Ruby sources and is called win32ole). > > During the cross compilation, I've re

[Mingw-w64-public] oaidl.h incorrect definitions for VARDESC, TYPEDESC and ELEMDESC for anonymous functions

2010-07-31 Thread Luis Lavena
Hello, I've installed i686-w64-mingw32 for darwin target (20100730), and I'm trying to cross-compile a Ruby extension that uses oleauto (it is bundled with Ruby sources and is called win32ole). During the cross compilation, I've received the following (in this gist), pasted below: /Users/luis/.r

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] pdh - 32bit

2010-07-31 Thread NightStrike
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> ‎Thank you! > > You're welcome! > >> When do you consider releasing 1.1 or something similar with new >> improvements from trunk but stable? >> > > Admins can answer that better. > Hopef

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-07-31 Thread Kai Tietz
2010/7/31 Chris Sutcliffe : >  On 7/30/10 11:40 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Doing a little more digging, it seems like it's not dllwrap at all, >> it's gcc: >> >> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -ozip32z64.dll -s >> -shared windll.o windllrc.o api.o zipl.o cryptl.o ttyiol.o zipf

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-07-31 Thread JonY
On 7/31/2010 22:17, JonY wrote: > On 7/31/2010 22:09, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> On 7/30/10 11:40 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>> Doing a little more digging, it seems like it's not dllwrap at all, >>> it's gcc: >>> >>> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -ozip32z64.dll -s >>> -shared w

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-07-31 Thread JonY
On 7/31/2010 22:09, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >On 7/30/10 11:40 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> Doing a little more digging, it seems like it's not dllwrap at all, >> it's gcc: >> >> x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -ozip32z64.dll -s >> -shared windll.o windllrc.o api.o zipl.o crypt

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Issues compiling Info-zip's zip 3.1c

2010-07-31 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 7/30/10 11:40 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > Doing a little more digging, it seems like it's not dllwrap at all, > it's gcc: > > x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -ozip32z64.dll -s > -shared windll.o windllrc.o api.o zipl.o cryptl.o ttyiol.o zipfilel.o > zipupl.o fileiol.o uti