On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Sisyphus wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ozkan Sezer"
>
>> Win64-targeting builds from mingw-w64 up to 2010-04-27 didn't
>> follow MSVC x64 convention and did *not* prepend an undersocore
>> to the symbols: this is why you are seeing the incompat
- Original Message -
From: "Ozkan Sezer"
> Win64-targeting builds from mingw-w64 up to 2010-04-27 didn't
> follow MSVC x64 convention and did *not* prepend an undersocore
> to the symbols: this is why you are seeing the incompatibilities
> with the newer toolchains.
>
> All win64-tar
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Sisyphus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Windows Vista I have been using the 64-bit 4.6.0 cross-compiler
> (automated build 20100414) for close on 12 months.
>
> I'm now finding that the static and import libraries built using it are
> unusable by any of the recent 64-bit comp
Hey
I already mentioned that problem on IRC some months ago, but it seems that
it has not been fixed. I downloaded the automated build
http://freefr.dl.sourceforge.net/project/mingw-w64/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win64/Automated%20Builds/mingw-w64-bin_i686-linux_20110422.tar.bz2
and there is stil
Hi,
On Windows Vista I have been using the 64-bit 4.6.0 cross-compiler
(automated build 20100414) for close on 12 months.
I'm now finding that the static and import libraries built using it are
unusable by any of the recent 64-bit compilers (and vice versa). Looks like
they require different g
On 4/26/2011 22:20, Jon wrote:
>>> I've read the
>>> https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=25062006 thread and
>>> would like to know the latest mingw-w64 recommendations for using
>>> LIBRARY_PATH. While I would like to be able to use LIBRARY_PATH as I do
>>> with other MinGW
> > I've read the
> > https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=25062006 thread and
> > would like to know the latest mingw-w64 recommendations for using
> > LIBRARY_PATH. While I would like to be able to use LIBRARY_PATH as I do
> > with other MinGW-based toolchains, is there ano
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:35 AM, JonY wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/6/2011 03:23, Marcin M. wrote:
>> so which triplet should i type?
Just download and run our makefile. It'll figure all that out for you.
--
