Hello Erik!
One data point: I have successfully built qt 4.8. (See inline
comments, below.)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Erik van Pienbroek
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As the Fedora project recently decided to introduce a recent gcc 4.7
> snapshot and perform a mass rebuild of all packages using it I
Hi,
As the Fedora project recently decided to introduce a recent gcc 4.7
snapshot and perform a mass rebuild of all packages using it I decided
to perform a mass rebuild as well for all cross compiled packages which
are currently in the Fedora mingw-w64 testing repository
(https://fedoraproject.or
>> Look sched.h and semaphore.h headers. They both are defined macros to
>> export. I offered the same patch.
>> What my patch does not suit you?
>>
>
> First, I said that I left that patch to others to review and decide.
>
> Second, and more importantly, I must unde
2012/1/18 niXman :
> 2012/1/18 Kai Tietz :
>> 2012/1/18 niXman :
>>> 2012/1/18 Ozkan Sezer :
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, niXman wrote:
> Look sched.h and semaphore.h headers. They both are defined macros to
> export. I offered the same patch.
> What my patch does not suit you
2012/1/18 Kai Tietz :
> 2012/1/18 niXman :
>> 2012/1/18 Ozkan Sezer :
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, niXman wrote:
Look sched.h and semaphore.h headers. They both are defined macros to
export. I offered the same patch.
What my patch does not suit you?
>>>
>>> First, I sai
2012/1/18 niXman :
> 2012/1/18 Ozkan Sezer :
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, niXman wrote:
>>> Look sched.h and semaphore.h headers. They both are defined macros to
>>> export. I offered the same patch.
>>> What my patch does not suit you?
>>>
>>
>> First, I said that I left that patch to othe
2012/1/18 Ozkan Sezer :
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:14 AM, niXman wrote:
>> Look sched.h and semaphore.h headers. They both are defined macros to
>> export. I offered the same patch.
>> What my patch does not suit you?
>>
>
> First, I said that I left that patch to others to review and decide.
>
>
