Am 19.03.2012 17:57, schrieb
mingw...@csmiller.demon.co.uk:
Hi,
I'm having difficulty determining which packages I need to download to
get MinGW to build for 64bit targets. My host platform is MS Windows 7.
I downloaded MinGW32 from
On 16/3/2012 4:52 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
the problem i had is that if I pass --host=foobar, the autotools
search for foobar-ar and not foobar-gcc-ar, hence an error
gcc-ar is not the same as ar from binutils. That is something that comes
with gcc 4.7. While I'm not quite sure what is does,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/3/2012 4:52 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
the problem i had is that if I pass --host=foobar, the autotools
search for foobar-ar and not foobar-gcc-ar, hence an error
gcc-ar is not the same as ar from
On 21/3-2012 5:45 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
then that's problematic... There is a tool that I don't know what it
does, and setting host will result in failing because of a missing
***-ar.exe
But that's most probably your fault. You have configured binutils wrong,
or you don't have binutils
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 5:45 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
then that's problematic... There is a tool that I don't know what it
does, and setting host will result in failing because of a missing
***-ar.exe
But that's
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 5:45 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
then that's problematic... There is a tool that I don't know what it
does, and setting host will result in
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 5:45 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
then that's problematic...
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com:
my original mail :
in x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-4.7.0-3_rubenvb.7z, ar.exe is also named
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc-ar.exe and not x86_64-w64-mingw32-ar.exe. Is it
normal ?
I asked about this, too:
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 5:45
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:10
On 21/3-2012 8:46 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
as Kai and I pointed out, you misconfigured by not specifying the --build
option, implicitely telling autotools you were cross-compiling, resulting in
it wanting a triplet-ar. Nowhere in that little story did any reference
to any triple-gcc-ar ever
2012/3/21 Christer Solskogen christer.solsko...@gmail.com:
On 21/3-2012 8:46 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
as Kai and I pointed out, you misconfigured by not specifying the --build
option, implicitely telling autotools you were cross-compiling, resulting in
it wanting a triplet-ar. Nowhere in that
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 8:46 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
as Kai and I pointed out, you misconfigured by not specifying the --build
option, implicitely telling autotools you were cross-compiling, resulting in
it wanting
2012/3/21 Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21/3-2012 8:46 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
as Kai and I pointed out, you misconfigured by not specifying the --build
option, implicitely telling autotools
code which used to work now no longer works. this mailing list once told me to
no longer use OSVERSIONINFOEX but instead use OSVERSIONINFOEXA.
well, I have code which looks like below, and the dots version number doesn't
even print.
so what's going on?
I am using 4.7.0 2027, which is the
I think I can help with the manifests.
I wrote a web page on them
http://jesusnjim.com/code/compilers/mingw.html#manifest
I also have some batch files on that page which automatically make manifests
for programs, and they work. you can look at the source of the batch file to
see how they
16 matches
Mail list logo