On 8/17/2012 11:45 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> I don't think cmd.exe supports backticks '`'.
I suspected that much so that is why I downloaded the msys package
and tried building with that.
> GTK uses configure scripts etc. to build if I'm not mistaken. When you
> run from MSYS you should call MS
On 8/7/12, Damon Register wrote:
> On 8/17/2012 4:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
>> You should call only the executables in mingw32/bin, never directly use
>> the ones
>> in mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/bin. The simplest way to set up a build
>> environment is
>> to doubleclick on "mingw32env.cmd".
> T
2012/8/7 Damon Register
> On 8/17/2012 4:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > You should call only the executables in mingw32/bin, never directly use
> the ones
> > in mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/bin. The simplest way to set up a build
> environment is
> > to doubleclick on "mingw32env.cmd".
> Thanks f
On 8/17/2012 4:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> You should call only the executables in mingw32/bin, never directly use the
> ones
> in mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/bin. The simplest way to set up a build
> environment is
> to doubleclick on "mingw32env.cmd".
Thanks for the tip. I just downloaded the
2012/8/17 Ozkan Sezer
> On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> >>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
> >>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
> >>> guard against an application
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 14:12, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> Am 17.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
>> gcc/system.h has its declaration guarded by #if defined
>> (HAVE_DECL_GETCWD) && !HAVE_DECL_GETCWD ... so the question is why
>> doesn't it work and the header h
On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
>>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
>>> guard against an application using the CRT functions that are n
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>> information, see Windows Runtime Unsupported CRT Functions." How does
>> one know when they are "in the Windows Runtime"? I.E. How can we
>> guard against an application using the CRT functions that are not
>> supported "in the Windows Runti
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> (I'm not entirely sure what the "c++" executable is
> or does)
It is a symlink or copy of g++. The same is true for gcc and cc.
--
Earnie
-- https://sites.google.com/site/earnieboyd
--
On 8/17/12, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>>
>> That's a good question, it seems like MSVC has only one declaration in
>> direct.h. I don't know why do we have it duplicated in io.h. IMO we
>> should consider removing it from there, leaving only direct.h
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> That's a good question, it seems like MSVC has only one declaration in
> direct.h. I don't know why do we have it duplicated in io.h. IMO we
> should consider removing it from there, leaving only direct.h version.
My guess is that the MS dire
Works well on Ubuntu 12.04. I just compiled Qt5 + QtCreator + Qbs's test
demos successful.
Thanks for your great work!
2012/8/17 Ruben Van Boxem
> Hi everyone,
>
> I kind of borked parts of my previous 4.7 release. I apologize again,
> because I should have caught the problems reported before I
On 16/08/12 21:34, Alex Loukissas wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> It appears that with addr2line I got quite far. Unfortunately, I haven't
> been able to try out the libbfd option, since it appears that this
> library isn't included in the standard ubuntu mingw package.
Good thing it's not there; see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
> gcc/system.h has its declaration guarded by #if defined (HAVE_DECL_GETCWD)
> && !HAVE_DECL_GETCWD ... so the question is why doesn't it work and the
> header has to declare a library function by itself?
>
in
2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> On Aug 17 12:40, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> > > On Aug 17 12:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > > > For my Arch Linux cross-compilers I don't use a sysroot: there's no
> > > point.
> > > > Just install to prefix=/usr and be done with it.
> >
On Aug 17 12:40, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> > On Aug 17 12:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > > For my Arch Linux cross-compilers I don't use a sysroot: there's no
> > point.
> > > Just install to prefix=/usr and be done with it.
> > > Every prefixed binary is placed nicely
2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> On Aug 17 12:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> > > On Aug 16 08:16, NightStrike wrote:
> > > > Even if I agreed with the with-sysroot default, these should be
> > > > committed as two separate things. So, approved for the /include bug.
> >
On Aug 17 12:19, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> > On Aug 16 08:16, NightStrike wrote:
> > > Even if I agreed with the with-sysroot default, these should be
> > > committed as two separate things. So, approved for the /include bug.
> > > We should talk about the with-sysroot
2012/8/17 Ozkan Sezer
> On 8/17/12, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > 2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
> >
> >> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> >> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> >> > > Hallo Rainer,
> >> >
> >> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> >> > >
2012/8/17 Corinna Vinschen
> On Aug 16 08:16, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > >> Index: configure.ac
> > >> ===
> > >> --- configure.ac (revision 5352)
> > >> +++ configure.
On 8/17/12, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> 2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
>
>> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
>> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
>> > > Hallo Rainer,
>> >
>> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
>> > > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'.
On Aug 16 08:16, NightStrike wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> Index: configure.ac
> >> ===
> >> --- configure.ac (revision 5352)
> >> +++ configure.ac (working copy)
> >> @@ -16,12 +16,1
On 08/17/12 11:33, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Am 17.08.2012 09:37, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> > After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
> > declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping
> > gcc-4.8.0.
>
> > In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0
2012/8/17 Jacek Caban
> On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> > Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> > > Hallo Rainer,
> >
> > > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> > > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> > > seaching on
On 08/17/12 11:42, Rainer Emrich wrote:
> Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> > Hallo Rainer,
>
> > well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> > pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> > seaching on msdn for getcwd. For 32-bit it is just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 11:29, schrieb Kai Tietz:
> Hallo Rainer,
>
> well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
> pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
> seaching on msdn for getcwd. For 32-bit it is just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 17.08.2012 09:37, schrieb Rainer Emrich:
> After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
> declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping
> gcc-4.8.0.
>
> In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/
Hallo Rainer,
well, the issue is that msvcrt's getcwd has as second argument the
pointer-length-argument typed as 'int'. You can check this also by
seaching on msdn for getcwd.
For 32-bit it is just a sign-difference of this argument, which is
pretty unlikely to reach (0x7fffu + 1u). For 64-
Op 17 aug. 2012 01:44 schreef "Herb Thompson" het
volgende:
>
> On 2012-08-16 3:32 PM, Ruben Van Boxem wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > ...
> >
> > I am in the process of uploading 4.7.1-2-release packages. I tested the
> > i686-win32 compiler, and it doesn't crash.
> >
> > ...
>
>
>
> On my Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After the gcc cxx-conversion merge has taken place, I get a conflicting
declaration of getcwd in io.h in several places while bootstrapping gcc-4.8.0.
In file included from ../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/ggc-common.c:25:0:
../../../src/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/syste
30 matches
Mail list logo